YIKES: Did Jasmine Crockett Just Tell Democrats to POUND SAND? Because It Sounds...
Marc Elias Tries (and Fails) to Rewrite Mail-In Ballot Voting History
How Keith Ellison Reacts to Journo Asking Him About Minnesota Fraud PROVES He...
DAAAMN, Son: UK Survivor Helps SHRED Mehdi Hasan in BRUTAL Back and Forth...
Humza Yousaf Wastes NO Time Turning Edinburgh 'Attack' Into 'Muslims Are the Real...
Jessica Tarlov's 'He COULD Be a Weird, Gay Vegan BUT' Save for James...
Police Release Photo of Karmelo Anthony’s Multi-Tool ‘Like With the Little Scissors’
Panefully Stupid: KTVU Reports Car Break-Ins Decline, Glass Repair Shops Hardest Hit
TRAs in Scotland Upset That Men Who Think They're Women Will Be Incarcerated...
Tulsi Gabbard Adds ANOTHER Element to Her Fauci Document Drop (Media Shaming INCOMING)
First Transgender State Legislator Sentenced to 33 Years for Child Porn, Claimed Retardati...
Sen. Chris Murphy Notes That No President Except Trump Has Ever Stolen Air...
After Beheading, Elmo Makes It Clear That He's Rooting for Team USA in...
The Atlantic's Matt Viser Went to Journalism School to Learn New Things, Like...
The Atlantic Looks at Pete Hegseth's Efforts to Diminish the Role of Blacks...

WaPo reporter notes how much this month's 'huge change in Biden's legacy' has cost us so far

Yesterday the Washington Post’s editorial board published something that frankly we were surprised to see when they called Biden’s student loan forgiveness plan a “regressive, expensive mistake”:

Advertisement

Mr. Biden’s plan is also expensive — and likely inflationary. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates that extending the loan pause to the end of the year would cost $20 billion, while forgiving $10,000 for households making less than $300,000 would cost $230 billion. Together, these policies would nullify nearly a decade’s worth of deficit reduction from the Inflation Reduction Act. Moreover, it is unclear that the 1965 Higher Education Act even grants the president the legal authority to take such a sweeping step, given that it was historically understood to permit only more targeted relief.
[…]
Mr. Biden’s student loan decision will not do enough to help the most vulnerable Americans. It will, however, provide a windfall for those who don’t need it — with American taxpayers footing the bill.

However, Washington Post economic reporter Jeff Stein sees what Biden’s done in the last few weeks as a legacy enhancer. A really, really expensive legacy enhancer:

Advertisement

Spending a giant pile of money we don’t have is the key to a “legacy” now? We’re guessing the next time there’s a Republican in the White House printing and spending money like crazy it won’t be framed as a “huge change in legacy.”

What a LEGACY!

There was a slight correction:

Wasn’t this supposed to be an “Inflation Reduction Act”?

Biden could end up with a “legacy,” but it might not be the kind he’d like:

Advertisement

Watching this White House (with the media’s help) pretend we’re in the middle of an economic utopia is just laughable.

***

Related:

WaPo Editorial Board’s take on Joe Biden canceling student loan debt might not be what you were expecting

WaPo columnist opposes debt cancellation because ‘it just wasn’t bad enough to justify government intervention’

Mega-thread shows that WaPo didn’t always have an aversion to Nazi comparisons and terms like ‘banana republic’

***

Editor’s Note:

Help us keep owning the libs! Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code AMERICAFIRST to receive a 25% discount off your membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement