WHOOPS! NY Times accidentally drops narrative-busting bomb on the Dems' voter ID talking points

There’s a controversial voter ID law in North Dakota, and the New York Times reports that the voters have spoken:

Galvanized by a voter ID law, Native Americans turned out in record numbers in North Dakota — and a Native American woman unseated the law's architect https://t.co/O6gZq5Jbm0

— NYT Politics (@nytpolitics) November 14, 2018

For many, there’s a Democrat talking point in that headline that got shredded:

So clearly the Voter ID law wasn't suppressing their vote.

— Sgt. K. Onyx (@SgtKOnyx) November 14, 2018

So Voter ID did not "suppress the vote" in North Dakota. Thank you. https://t.co/m8HI1dtJTW

— Sister Toldjah ? (@sistertoldjah) November 14, 2018

Yes, thanks a lot, NY Times!

So it did not suppress voting https://t.co/sxLW4S3wgN

— Kurt Schlichter (@KurtSchlichter) November 14, 2018

I thought voter ID laws suppressed votes… https://t.co/zJYZ7eNioi

— Doctor ?? (@drhampel1) November 14, 2018

So Voter ID laws didn't suppress their votes? The media coverage was a lie and it worked for the Democrats? Shocker. https://t.co/hkBMAw4knZ

— Dale Jackson (@TheDaleJackson) November 14, 2018

Wait, so they voted to overturn a Voter ID law they believed suppressed their vote and won? ? https://t.co/qWtRlErHwP

— Chad Felix Greene (@chadfelixg) November 14, 2018

Recommended

POPCORN! DataRepublican Says 'Hello' to Mr. Hunter Biden and His Newfound Popularity on X and HERE WE GO

Sam J.

Advertisement

But guess what point won’t be taken…

They'll never learn that lesson from that data.

— Pradheep J. Shanker, M.D., M.S. (@Neoavatara) November 14, 2018

Was not mentioned once in the article.

— Sister Toldjah ? (@sistertoldjah) November 14, 2018

And call attention to a Democrat talking point that got shot down in the same story? Never!