The New York Times has been committing the sin of not looking the other way when it comes to Hillary Clinton’s private server, deleted email and all the rest:
It seems harder and harder to deny that the New York Times genuinely does not like Hillary Clinton
— Michael Cohen (@speechboy71) September 10, 2015
https://twitter.com/lisang/status/641786623525527552
@lisang http://t.co/Jrhxn4Me2Z
— Michael Cohen (@speechboy71) September 10, 2015
That kind of reporting was bound to also appear on the radar of Media Matters’ Eric Boehlert:
Q is are Dems going to just watch NYT openly wage war on Dem frontrunner, or are Dems going to respond? https://t.co/awpg3indTW
— Eric Boehlert (@EricBoehlert) September 10, 2015
Translation?
https://twitter.com/BecketAdams/status/641795135819354112
Can’t have any reports out there about the Dems scandal-plagued candidate faltering in the polls.
What is "too much to ignore for a $100, Alex?" Do you not get? https://t.co/wZ7z0XQI4H
— TopSecretK9 Meme Debunker (@topsecretk9) September 10, 2015
@EricBoehlert "War" to Democrats is "reporting facts"? Ok. Good luck in your "War on facts". You've been training for years, right?
— Bert Difig (@BertDifig1) September 10, 2015
https://twitter.com/WhatMediaBias/status/641801920395509760
https://twitter.com/BruceNV/status/641796062567641088
@EricBoehlert pic.twitter.com/6i2lOAwCUh
— Andrew Wagner (@andrewwagner) September 10, 2015
https://twitter.com/hammers877/status/641798809111031808
https://twitter.com/dad_of_jacob/status/641797468385071104
https://twitter.com/Me_In_Jersey/status/641796364247109633
Of course, depending on which polls you look at these days, Boehlert’s tweet could have been read a different way:
They're going after Bernie? https://t.co/NmJCWyvPAX
— Scott (@ScottyE_FL) September 10, 2015