Politico’s Glenn Thrush, who reported the story that ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos donated $50,000 to the Clinton Foundation without disclosing it to viewers or his employer, is offering a defense of the Foundation against those blasting its lack of ethics and transparency:
@samsteinhp @StephenGutowski I have no problem with the donation — despite the ACORNing of the foundation. He needed to disclose to viewers
— Glenn Thrush (@GlennThrush) May 14, 2015
Wait, what?
"ACORNING" RT @GlennThrush: I have no problem with the donation — despite the ACORNing of the foundation. He needed to disclose to viewers
— Melissa Mackenzie ? (@MelissaTweets) May 14, 2015
https://twitter.com/JammieWF/status/598880755838754816
That’s what we thought he said.
Please define "ACORNing" for us. @GlennThrush @NoahCRothman @samsteinhp @StephenGutowski
— Jojo (@KoenigJojo) May 14, 2015
@KoenigJojo quiz: ACORN/foundation ever do anything good?
— Glenn Thrush (@GlennThrush) May 14, 2015
@GlennThrush @KoenigJojo Yeah, it helped O become prez!
— FloPats (@lilcheerbro) May 14, 2015
Now there’s some kind of defense of the Clinton Foundation.
https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/598870636899999744
https://twitter.com/RobProvince/status/598866753305776128
Something tells me @GlennThrush doesn't mean "exposing rampant fraud" when he says "ACORNing" https://t.co/4Y2HTkUYYn
— Jason Hart (@jasonahart) May 14, 2015
Go Go Gadget Fedora! RT @NoahCRothman: Wow. https://t.co/by2ENXFwCj
— Jimmy (@JimmyPrinceton) May 14, 2015
Thrush’s spinning in favor of the Clinton Foundation is nothing new.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member