@lachlan @SCOTUSblog Classic.
— Concrete Charlie (@JumpyNelson) June 30, 2014
SCOTUSblog is a fantastic resource for learning about all-things related to the U.S. Supreme Court. The SCOTUSblog Twitter feed says on the main page that they are “a private blog about the Supreme Court of the U.S.”
“Private,” as in “not part of the Supreme Court.”
But learning the background information about SCOTUSblog before commenting isn’t on the agenda for some who are angry with this morning’s Supreme Court decision on the Hobby Lobby case.
SCOTUSblog retweeted many and provided a funny running commentary about the cluelessness:
It won’t be televised here MT @cjnkira: @SCOTUSblog you ruled against the working people, especially women, today. Revolution is coming.
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 30, 2014
We thought blogging seemed very 21st century. MT @Iiuslep: @SCOTUSblog want to obliterate any progressive acheivement of 20th century.
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 30, 2014
Least we could do. MT @HeathNOLA: @SCOTUSblog oh they can still get coverage? How generous of you.
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 30, 2014
Failure of democracy. MT @Rockinwil: Time to do away with the @SCOTUSblog since they are no longer representing citizens of the US.
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 30, 2014
Um…… -Amy. RT @VictoriaaC0418: Hey @SCOTUSblog … Thanks for treating women like second class citizens.
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 30, 2014
Sticks and stones RT @Im_X1: @SCOTUSblog You disgust me. The very antithesis of all the United States stands for. You all should be ashamed.
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 30, 2014
Noted. -Scalia MT @ypiddle: @SCOTUSblog You sided with the crazies. Good job!! Tell your boys to keep their thingies in their pants.
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 30, 2014
But you complete us. MT @stevenwishnoff: @SCOTUSblog You disgust me.
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 30, 2014
When you start reading our description. MT @ProgressivesWin: @SCOTUSblog When will you start honoring the constitution. #5OldBigots
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 30, 2014
File a petition MT @yenisargueta: Thanks for not giving me the choice to my own body @SCOTUSblog Can I get carrots banned cause I want to?
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 30, 2014
ShahidaOnLaw RT @ShahidaOnHealth: This @SCOTUSblog ruling allows bosses to force their personal beliefs on employees.#Obamacare #ACA
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 30, 2014
You are not the 1st & won’t be the last @JayRooTheDee: everyone should tweet @SCOTUSblog and tell them what we think of their misogyny.
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 30, 2014
We were going for Pandora’s Box. MT @cericme: @SCOTUSblog Congratulations on opening a HUGE can of worms and abused.
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 30, 2014
Thank God RT @aclery: @Pontifex please help United States #women & tell @SCOTUSblog that denying health care because of sex is dehumanizing.
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 30, 2014
Or eating the cheap Kung Pao Chicken MT @NYCPainter1: Of all the bad decisions @SCOTUSblog made the last few years, #HobbyLobby is the worst
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 30, 2014
Lost our copy, apologies. MT @opinali: @SCOTUSblog today you have f@cked up real hard. Go read the f@cking First Amendment again, OK?
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 30, 2014
Oh the irony:
Whoa, “uninformed”? MT @Nicole_Cameron: Wow. @SCOTUSblog what a way to wake up in 1950s. Giving healthcare to the uninformed, the prejudiced
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 30, 2014
Sheer genius!
@SCOTUSblog retweeted this evidence that reality is a hard sell:
The passive aggressive way @SCOTUSblog is answering right now is horrible considering the position they just put women in. Not okay.
— Boreona Virus (@wollythedane) June 30, 2014
Editor’s note: This post has been updated to include additional tweets.
***
Related:
‘Fu*k you:’ Left-wingers want to ‘burn down’ Hobby Lobby after SCOTUS win
‘Clueless or lying’: Sandra Fluke ‘purposefully ignoring’ fact about Hobby Lobby decision
Join the conversation as a VIP Member