The Supreme Court Rules on Deportations to Third-Party Countries (LAWSPLAINING)
UK Home Secretary Reopening Resettlement Schemes for Palestinians Who Have Fled the Horror...
Sen. Mark Warner Says 100,000 Virginians Have Been Kicked Off of SNAP Because...
Sunny Hostin Defended the Cornell 7 — and, Painfully, She’s Right
Rev. Suggests Lazarus Was Gay Because Jesus Called for Him to ‘Come Out’
Rep. LaMonica McIver Is Facing Prison for Touching ICE Officers — She Just...
Mamdani the Pied-À-Terrible: NYC Mayor Loses in Court on Tax-The-Rich Rollout
The Bulwark’s Focus Group Says Abdul El-Sayed Is Over-Performing With Trump Voters
Kyle Kulinski Has No Doubt Mossad Has Videos of Trump 'Doing Ungodly Things...
Cory Booker Thinks a Criminal Who Undermined One Election Is Very Likely to...
Tight Race, Tight Pants: James Talarico Victory Could Obliterate State Religion of Texas...
Venezuelan Shot by ICE Charged by DOJ With Assaulting a Federal Officer
El-Sayed Wants Money Out of Politics — Except the Soros Family That Hand-Selected...
Jack Smith Subpoenaed Checks From Thousands of Americans Who Donated As Little As...
The Cornell 7: Viral Outrage, Changing Statements, and Why Prosecutors May Have Walked...
Premium

UK Charity Trying to Understand Decision to Deny Access to a Boat Carrying 'Asylum-Seekers'

Twitchy

I realize I already did a post on the U.K., about the "feminist" Labour member of Parliament who doesn't believe men should have their own clubs, believes that men pretending to be women should have access to women's spaces, and posed for a selfie with women who were not allowed to participate in a sex-segregated Muslim march. J.K. Rowling hit her with a massive truth-nuke.

A lot of people in the comments noted that the Muslim women were wearing all black and had their faces covered with black masks. Does that make them "thuggish and intimidating" too, like the British patriots who blocked buses carrying 140 Muslim "asylum-seekers" who'd just gotten off a boat at Portsmouth?

I had to look up what RNLI stood for. It's a charity called the Royal National Lifeboat Institution that "rescues people in distress at sea, including asylum seekers crossing the English Channel, regardless of how they got into danger."

According to Sky News, the RNLI has said it is working to "understand the decision to deny access" by multiple ports to its boat that was carrying more than 100 migrants on Sunday. If I'm understanding correctly, the RNLI sends out boats into the English Channel to "rescue" migrants from their dinghies and put them on its own boats to take them to port.

Sky News reports:

A request to land an RNLI boat carrying more than 100 migrants at the Port of Southampton and the Port of Portsmouth was refused on Sunday.

When the migrants were landed at Eastney harbour in Portsmouth, anti-migrant protesters blocked road access to the port.

…

The statement from RNLI came on the same day as the charity's chief executive said abuse of RNLI volunteers is "wholly unacceptable in a civilised society".

Peter Sparkes said recent protests had "generated deliberate misinformation and a misunderstanding" about the charity, and condemned threats by "those who would hide behind a balaclava or a keyboard".

It's not really difficult to understand. The British people have finally had it with just one boat too many dropping off fighting-age Muslim men who have no intention of assimilating and are bussed to "migrant hotels" paid for by the taxpayer.

Those are real, by the way.

If you're truly seeking asylum, you're supposed to seek it in the first safe country you reach. How many countries, including France, do these "asylum-seekers" pass through to get to the United Kingdom and all of its generous benefits?

***

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement