UK Charity Trying to Understand Decision to Deny Access to a Boat Carrying 'Asylum-Seekers'

Sep 10, 2026 12:00 AM
Premium
Advertisement
UK Charity Trying to Understand Decision to Deny Access to a Boat Carrying 'Asylum-Seekers'
Twitchy
VIP

I realize I already did a post on the U.K., about the "feminist" Labour member of Parliament who doesn't believe men should have their own clubs, believes that men pretending to be women should have access to women's spaces, and posed for a selfie with women who were not allowed to participate in a sex-segregated Muslim march. J.K. Rowling hit her with a massive truth-nuke.

A lot of people in the comments noted that the Muslim women were wearing all black and had their faces covered with black masks. Does that make them "thuggish and intimidating" too, like the British patriots who blocked buses carrying 140 Muslim "asylum-seekers" who'd just gotten off a boat at Portsmouth?

I had to look up what RNLI stood for. It's a charity called the Royal National Lifeboat Institution that "rescues people in distress at sea, including asylum seekers crossing the English Channel, regardless of how they got into danger."

According to Sky News, the RNLI has said it is working to "understand the decision to deny access" by multiple ports to its boat that was carrying more than 100 migrants on Sunday. If I'm understanding correctly, the RNLI sends out boats into the English Channel to "rescue" migrants from their dinghies and put them on its own boats to take them to port.

Sky News reports:

A request to land an RNLI boat carrying more than 100 migrants at the Port of Southampton and the Port of Portsmouth was refused on Sunday.

When the migrants were landed at Eastney harbour in Portsmouth, anti-migrant protesters blocked road access to the port.

…

The statement from RNLI came on the same day as the charity's chief executive said abuse of RNLI volunteers is "wholly unacceptable in a civilised society".

Peter Sparkes said recent protests had "generated deliberate misinformation and a misunderstanding" about the charity, and condemned threats by "those who would hide behind a balaclava or a keyboard".

It's not really difficult to understand. The British people have finally had it with just one boat too many dropping off fighting-age Muslim men who have no intention of assimilating and are bussed to "migrant hotels" paid for by the taxpayer.

Those are real, by the way.

If you're truly seeking asylum, you're supposed to seek it in the first safe country you reach. How many countries, including France, do these "asylum-seekers" pass through to get to the United Kingdom and all of its generous benefits?

***

Comments

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy: Hilarious Political Commentary & Current Events Videos