Jennifer Siebel Newsom’s Parenting Tips Include Dolls for Boys and Gender-Swapping Male Bo...
NBC News: Death of Refugee Released by Border Patrol Determined to Be a...
New ‘Maryland Man’ Joins ‘Virginia Dad’ in the Headlines
Meryl Streep Tells Colbert Married Women May Be Disqualified at Voting Booth If...
The Bulwark's Jonathan V. Last: ‘America Lost. Iran Won.’
This is Why Parents Are Fleeing Public Schools: NYC Teacher Calls for Seizing...
Expert on Grand Strategy Can't See the Rationale for Blowing Up a Bridge...
ActBlue Lashes Out: Accuses NYT and Its Own Lawyers of Lying in the...
Nancy Pelosi’s Daughter Thanks Sketch Artist Who Captured Justice KBJ Schooling Trump
Sky News Reporter: Apollo Mission Wasn't for All Humanity Because It Was All...
Everybody Has the Same Question After Newsom Press Office Posts 'President With a...
Canadian Butthurt Over Joke About ‘Our Moon’
Under Duress: Colorado Demands Lawyers Promise Not to Aid Feds on Immigration or...
Harry Reid in 1993: 'No Sane Country Would Do This.' Harry Reid's Party...
MN Dems Still Debating Whether There's an Inherent Right to Life for... Wild...

MSNBC editor 'troubled' that Carnegie Mellon would disavow that heinous tweet by one of its professors

Now that Queen Elizabeth II has passed away, takes on British colonization (or even its brutal and bloody decolonization) are a dime a dozen. But it took someone special to come up with a take so heinous that Twitter removed it. Carnegie Mellon’s Uju Anya tweeted, “I heard the chief monarch of a thieving raping genocidal empire is finally dying. May her pain be excruciating.” Carnegie Mellon put out a statement saying Anya’s words did not reflect the value of the institution — pretty weak — but an editor at MSNBC found it “troubling” that the university might not want to be tainted by such an awful tweet.

Advertisement

Zeeshan Aleem writes:

Universities almost never issue statements like this because the very premise of a university is to serve as a bastion of independent thinking and provide a forum for intellectual free-for-alls. A university would never be presumed to endorse any of its scholars’ individual beliefs, which is key for academia as a space for provocation to thrive. So in effect, this statement was a condemnation and implicitly a signal to other academics at the university that they should watch their mouth on certain matters. While the motivation behind the unusual statement is unclear, it underscores how vulnerable public intellectuals are to controversy-driven social media pile-ons.

Cutting her loose would have been a signal to other academics to watch their mouths.

Advertisement

And the queen was supposedly setting foreign policy at the time?

Advertisement

We’re guessing she has tenure and can fully indulge in her mental health issues.

***

Editor’s Note:
 
Help us keep owning the libs! Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code AMERICAFIRST to receive a 25% discount off your membership!

Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement