JB Pritzker Makes Himself an Exception to Mamdani and Sanders' 'Billionaires Shouldn't Exi...
All Hell Broke Loose When Jamie Raskin Got Himself Caught
Lefties Praising Mamdani Leadership for 'Fixing Things' in NYC Are Leaving Out THIS...
Trek Tantrums: Wil Wheaton and George Takei Throw Hissy Fits Over The Rock...
Here's the WH's Submission for X Post Forever Unmatched (We KNEW Hillary Should...
Jonathan Turley Has a Short Reading Assignment for Media Putting Woke Spin on...
Need a Mirror? Hillary Clinton Trips Over ... Hillary Clinton In Post About...
Illinois Governor Who Said Biden Was Mentally Sharp Just Diagnosed Trump With Dementia
Bernie Sanders' 'Hottest Ever Summer' Rant About Fossil Fuels Sounded VERY Familiar (and...
Pramila Jayapal Is Very Upset That Parents of Children Murdered By Illegals Are...
Scott Jennings Calls Birthright Citizenship Ruling by SCOTUS an ‘Abomination’ That Benefit...
Dems Frame Their SCOTUS Birthright Citizenship Victory As a Hyper-Partisan Loss, Vow to...
NYC DSA Leader Won’t Condemn Darializa Avila Chevalier’s Post About Wiping Her Dirty...
Third Reich Rugrat: Middle School Yearbook Baby Photo Is Causing a ‘Führer’ in...
Ringleader of Pakistani Grooming Gang Stripped of Citizenship but Can't Be Deported

Gov. Andrew Cuomo would close 'loophole' in rape law by including women 'allegedly too drunk to consent'

Daily Wire senior editor Ashe Schow is the person to follow when it comes to laws and college policies regarding sexual assault. She’s a big believer in due process and a thorn in the sides of university kangaroo courts that put a heavy thumb on the male’s side of the scale when it comes to judging who is guilty in an alleged sexual assault.

Advertisement

Now she’s looking into New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s proposed legislative fix to a “loophole” in rape law in which he claims “prosecutors cannot bring rape charges against an accused person if an accuser voluntarily consumes alcohol.” Cuomo is going to muddy that up by redefining sexual consent to exclude women who are “conscious but allegedly too drunk to consent.” There’s a whole lot of wiggle room in that word, “allegedly.”

Schow writes:

This new law does what college campuses around the country already do – treat alcohol consumption as a negating effect on consent. It essentially turns all drunk sex into rape, and allows anyone who consumed any amount of alcohol to claim they couldn’t consent.

It also only punishes one side of the equation – whoever the accusation is made against. Often, both parties are drunk, making a law like this pretty meaningless if properly followed, because if both parties are drunk, both parties are both victims and rapists.

Of course, that is never how such a policy is upheld. Never forget Duke University dean Sue Wasiolek, who years ago infamously testified that when both parties are drunk, “assuming it is a male and female, it is the responsibility in the case of the male to gain consent before proceeding with sex.”

Advertisement

So if it comes to court, the alleged victim can just claim she was too drunk to consent? How drunk?

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos