This Was All Trump Needed. They're Gonna Regret It.
Court Upholds a Ban That Dems and Lib Media Insisted Was a Conservative...
Hillary Clinton Has Decided to Ring in America's 250th Birthday by Whining About...
Rapid Response 47 Sinks Another Disingenuous Take From Aaron Rupar (This Time About...
'DEPRAVED': When Tim Walz Talks About His 'Values' As MN Governor, Here's What...
Twitchy Celebrates America 250
David Axelrod Turns Off Replies After Sharing a Personal Experience in a City...
Scott Jennings Explains the ‘Patriotism Gap’ Between Republicans and Democrats to CNN’s An...
Public Pool in Germany Evacuated After Dozens of French Men Jump the Fence
Man Genuinely Upset That Trump Has Ruined America’s 250th Birthday for Him
Love Above: Daredevil Couple Gets Engaged During Death-Defying Climb of Empire State Build...
Darializa 'Abolish the Police' Avila Chevalier Wants to Turn the US Into a...
Jordanian Immigrant Gets One Year in Jail For Killing a Jewish Man at...
CA Sen. Scott Wiener Votes Down Ban on Registered Sex Offenders Holding Office
Columbus, Buffalo Raise the Somali Flag Over City Hall to Celebrate Somali Independence...

Gov. Andrew Cuomo would close 'loophole' in rape law by including women 'allegedly too drunk to consent'

Daily Wire senior editor Ashe Schow is the person to follow when it comes to laws and college policies regarding sexual assault. She’s a big believer in due process and a thorn in the sides of university kangaroo courts that put a heavy thumb on the male’s side of the scale when it comes to judging who is guilty in an alleged sexual assault.

Advertisement

Now she’s looking into New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s proposed legislative fix to a “loophole” in rape law in which he claims “prosecutors cannot bring rape charges against an accused person if an accuser voluntarily consumes alcohol.” Cuomo is going to muddy that up by redefining sexual consent to exclude women who are “conscious but allegedly too drunk to consent.” There’s a whole lot of wiggle room in that word, “allegedly.”

Schow writes:

This new law does what college campuses around the country already do – treat alcohol consumption as a negating effect on consent. It essentially turns all drunk sex into rape, and allows anyone who consumed any amount of alcohol to claim they couldn’t consent.

It also only punishes one side of the equation – whoever the accusation is made against. Often, both parties are drunk, making a law like this pretty meaningless if properly followed, because if both parties are drunk, both parties are both victims and rapists.

Of course, that is never how such a policy is upheld. Never forget Duke University dean Sue Wasiolek, who years ago infamously testified that when both parties are drunk, “assuming it is a male and female, it is the responsibility in the case of the male to gain consent before proceeding with sex.”

Advertisement

So if it comes to court, the alleged victim can just claim she was too drunk to consent? How drunk?

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement