Here's How You Know WH Press and Dems Saying the WHCD Was an...
'Put One Ogre on a Pike': Fake Dr. Abdul El-Sayed's Violent Power Fantasy...
Let's Check on the Level of Media Disinterest in Rand Paul's Fauci Files...
Court Crushes Biden Tape Injunction — Explosive Interview Recordings Set for Imminent...
Fauci's Diary Provides Many More Reasons to Distrust and Despise the Media (Here...
'Don’t Bill Us Until After the Mid-Terms': DNC’s Desperate Cash-Masking Gambit
Talarico Discovers He Needs Black Voters After Defeating a Black Woman — Now...
Johnson Delivers House Wins as Pompeo Warns: Iran Still a Threat
YIKES! It Sure Looks Like the DNC's Doing Their Part to 'Get the...
Exposed: Fauci Dined at Jake Tapper’s Home During the Lockdowns He Pushed on...
What First Amendment? Shiloh Hendrix Judge Omitted a Pretty Key Detail in Her...
Monday Morning Meme Madness
A ‘Wish’ Squalled Wanda: ‘Journalists’ Mad at Trump Were ‘Syked’ Over WHCD Rush...
Democrats Push Haley Stevens As the ‘Authentic Voice of the People’ but No...
Fellow Americans: Trump Doubles Down on Comparing CNN’s Kaitlan Collins to Trans Icon...

Gov. Andrew Cuomo would close 'loophole' in rape law by including women 'allegedly too drunk to consent'

Daily Wire senior editor Ashe Schow is the person to follow when it comes to laws and college policies regarding sexual assault. She’s a big believer in due process and a thorn in the sides of university kangaroo courts that put a heavy thumb on the male’s side of the scale when it comes to judging who is guilty in an alleged sexual assault.

Advertisement

Now she’s looking into New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s proposed legislative fix to a “loophole” in rape law in which he claims “prosecutors cannot bring rape charges against an accused person if an accuser voluntarily consumes alcohol.” Cuomo is going to muddy that up by redefining sexual consent to exclude women who are “conscious but allegedly too drunk to consent.” There’s a whole lot of wiggle room in that word, “allegedly.”

Schow writes:

This new law does what college campuses around the country already do – treat alcohol consumption as a negating effect on consent. It essentially turns all drunk sex into rape, and allows anyone who consumed any amount of alcohol to claim they couldn’t consent.

It also only punishes one side of the equation – whoever the accusation is made against. Often, both parties are drunk, making a law like this pretty meaningless if properly followed, because if both parties are drunk, both parties are both victims and rapists.

Of course, that is never how such a policy is upheld. Never forget Duke University dean Sue Wasiolek, who years ago infamously testified that when both parties are drunk, “assuming it is a male and female, it is the responsibility in the case of the male to gain consent before proceeding with sex.”

Advertisement

So if it comes to court, the alleged victim can just claim she was too drunk to consent? How drunk?

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement