Monday Morning Meme Madness
Interruption Eruption: Margaret Brennan of CBS News Upset Byron Donalds Believes TPS Is...
Dem Sen. Chris Van Hollen Is Pondering White House Run, Not Sold on...
Total Shirt Show: Enes Kanter Wears ‘W’ Defining Tee to WNBA Game, Led...
School Board Shock: Trans Man Demands Expelling ‘Bigot’ Kids — Suggests Turning Them...
Talarico’s Big Brain Take: We’re All Branches on Same Tree … Except One...
Sen. Marsha Blackburn Remembers Sen. Nancy Kassebaum Baker
Sen. Rand Paul Shares His Plan to Deal With the Deficit
Sen. John Barrasso Serves What Dems Want on a One-Tweet Platter
'Indy' Dan Osborn for NE Senate Lets It Slip ... He'll Get Committees...
Chocolate Heiress 'Lulu Lenin' Discovers Noblesse Oblige (Just Not Where She Gives Away...
COWARD Mehdi Hasan Shuts Down Replies After MI Dem DROPS Him in BRUTAL...
Yup, He Went THERE: Brandon Gill NUKE-I-FIES Little Man Abdul El-Sayed for Racist...
Luddite: Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro Fear Mongers Data Centers
TRUTH-BOMB: What Bill Maher Just Said About James Talarico to Dana Bash's FACE...

Gov. Andrew Cuomo would close 'loophole' in rape law by including women 'allegedly too drunk to consent'

Daily Wire senior editor Ashe Schow is the person to follow when it comes to laws and college policies regarding sexual assault. She’s a big believer in due process and a thorn in the sides of university kangaroo courts that put a heavy thumb on the male’s side of the scale when it comes to judging who is guilty in an alleged sexual assault.

Advertisement

Now she’s looking into New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s proposed legislative fix to a “loophole” in rape law in which he claims “prosecutors cannot bring rape charges against an accused person if an accuser voluntarily consumes alcohol.” Cuomo is going to muddy that up by redefining sexual consent to exclude women who are “conscious but allegedly too drunk to consent.” There’s a whole lot of wiggle room in that word, “allegedly.”

Schow writes:

This new law does what college campuses around the country already do – treat alcohol consumption as a negating effect on consent. It essentially turns all drunk sex into rape, and allows anyone who consumed any amount of alcohol to claim they couldn’t consent.

It also only punishes one side of the equation – whoever the accusation is made against. Often, both parties are drunk, making a law like this pretty meaningless if properly followed, because if both parties are drunk, both parties are both victims and rapists.

Of course, that is never how such a policy is upheld. Never forget Duke University dean Sue Wasiolek, who years ago infamously testified that when both parties are drunk, “assuming it is a male and female, it is the responsibility in the case of the male to gain consent before proceeding with sex.”

Advertisement

So if it comes to court, the alleged victim can just claim she was too drunk to consent? How drunk?

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement