Americans Will Be So Triggered When the Whole Planet Cheers Every Goal Against...
Congresswoman Claims Trump's DOJ Is Harassing ActBlue CEO Because She's a Black Woman
Maine Candidate Hit with NEW Cheating Scandal — Ex Says Platner Knew About...
Here Are More Unhinged Reactions to the Karmelo Anthony Verdict
Newsweek: Karmelo Anthony, Kyle Rittenhouse, and Two Self-Defense Americas
Ms. Rachel Leads Protest Sing-Along Outside Delaney Hall
Jasmine Crockett Doubles Down on Support for Convicted Murderer Karmelo Anthony
CNN Asks Dem Rep and Daughter of Holocaust Survivor If She Backs Platner...
Maine's Teflon Candidate: Scandals Slide Off Platner as Voters Double Down
The Bulwark on Graham Platner’s Many, Many Scandals: BUT TRUMP!
The View's Sunny Hostin Declares Days of Dems Taking the Moral High Ground...
Democrats Loves Charles Barkley... Until He Names a Jewish Man for President in...
Karmelo Anthony Verdict Shatters Jasmine Crockett
Do the ActBlue CEO's Smug and BRIEF Non-Responses to Reps' Questions About Dems...
Ilhan Omar's 'Go Back' Taunt at Nancy Mace Explodes in Ironic Backlash

Gov. Andrew Cuomo would close 'loophole' in rape law by including women 'allegedly too drunk to consent'

Daily Wire senior editor Ashe Schow is the person to follow when it comes to laws and college policies regarding sexual assault. She’s a big believer in due process and a thorn in the sides of university kangaroo courts that put a heavy thumb on the male’s side of the scale when it comes to judging who is guilty in an alleged sexual assault.

Advertisement

Now she’s looking into New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s proposed legislative fix to a “loophole” in rape law in which he claims “prosecutors cannot bring rape charges against an accused person if an accuser voluntarily consumes alcohol.” Cuomo is going to muddy that up by redefining sexual consent to exclude women who are “conscious but allegedly too drunk to consent.” There’s a whole lot of wiggle room in that word, “allegedly.”

Schow writes:

This new law does what college campuses around the country already do – treat alcohol consumption as a negating effect on consent. It essentially turns all drunk sex into rape, and allows anyone who consumed any amount of alcohol to claim they couldn’t consent.

It also only punishes one side of the equation – whoever the accusation is made against. Often, both parties are drunk, making a law like this pretty meaningless if properly followed, because if both parties are drunk, both parties are both victims and rapists.

Of course, that is never how such a policy is upheld. Never forget Duke University dean Sue Wasiolek, who years ago infamously testified that when both parties are drunk, “assuming it is a male and female, it is the responsibility in the case of the male to gain consent before proceeding with sex.”

Advertisement

So if it comes to court, the alleged victim can just claim she was too drunk to consent? How drunk?

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement