Five-Card Dud: Trump Gloats As George Conway Gambles Away Millions in Crowded NY...
Socialism Surge: Scott Jennings Warns a Wave of Mamdani-Like Dem Candidates Could Wash...
Raze the Roof: Van Jones Says Socialist Primary Victories Signal Collapse of the...
Majority Muslim City Council in Michigan Bans the Pride Flag on Public Property;...
Atlantic Editor: Mike Lee Is a Monster for Not Caring About 1 Million...
Fetterman Warned It — Dirtbag Left on the March as Socialists Win Big...
Popehat Banned from Bluesky Over Bizarre Musk Assassination Missive
John Cornyn Credits US’ Traditionally Welcoming Immigration System for Successful Soccer T...
'Journalist' Sara Higdon Fact-Checked After Attacking Kash Patel's Girlfriend for Singing...
Antifa Terrorists Who Led ‘Noise Demo’ (With Guns) on ICE Facility Sentenced to...
Radical Hospitality? Poetica Coffee Owner FAFO: $400K Tax Deadbeat, 9/11 Truther, and Dan...
Judge Sides With Rioters, Says Safety Fence Around Federal Building Tramples Their Free...
LIVE Election Results With TWITCHY! Primary Night in New York, Maryland, and South...
SCOTUS: Rastafarian Can’t Sue Prison Guards for Shaving His Dreadlocks (Scott Wiener Whine...
SCOTUS: Green Card Holders Can Be Stripped of Legal Status If They Have...

Gov. Andrew Cuomo would close 'loophole' in rape law by including women 'allegedly too drunk to consent'

Daily Wire senior editor Ashe Schow is the person to follow when it comes to laws and college policies regarding sexual assault. She’s a big believer in due process and a thorn in the sides of university kangaroo courts that put a heavy thumb on the male’s side of the scale when it comes to judging who is guilty in an alleged sexual assault.

Advertisement

Now she’s looking into New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s proposed legislative fix to a “loophole” in rape law in which he claims “prosecutors cannot bring rape charges against an accused person if an accuser voluntarily consumes alcohol.” Cuomo is going to muddy that up by redefining sexual consent to exclude women who are “conscious but allegedly too drunk to consent.” There’s a whole lot of wiggle room in that word, “allegedly.”

Schow writes:

This new law does what college campuses around the country already do – treat alcohol consumption as a negating effect on consent. It essentially turns all drunk sex into rape, and allows anyone who consumed any amount of alcohol to claim they couldn’t consent.

It also only punishes one side of the equation – whoever the accusation is made against. Often, both parties are drunk, making a law like this pretty meaningless if properly followed, because if both parties are drunk, both parties are both victims and rapists.

Of course, that is never how such a policy is upheld. Never forget Duke University dean Sue Wasiolek, who years ago infamously testified that when both parties are drunk, “assuming it is a male and female, it is the responsibility in the case of the male to gain consent before proceeding with sex.”

Advertisement

So if it comes to court, the alleged victim can just claim she was too drunk to consent? How drunk?

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos