FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson WRECKS the Washington Post for Blatant Hit Job on...
Trump Ignites GOP Fire In Texas, Democrats About To Find Out
Nick Shirley Spotlights the Record Gavin Newsom Has to Overcome As His Presidential...
Dancing on Charlie Kirk’s Grave: Hanania’s Anniversary Hit Job and Ahmari’s Endorsement Sp...
This YOU, Sir? 'Sarah' McBride Passive-Aggressively Subtweeting John Fetterman Goes OH SO...
Paladino Tells Hasan Piker to Go Back Where He Came From — and...
BOOM — > Kurt Schlichter DISMANTLES Marc Elias and His Overseas Voter Scare...
WI Dem Gives Democrats Up Claiming She's Visiting 'Constituents' in Detention Center
Nice Try, WEIRDO: So, About That Fancy List of Fancy 'Republicans' Endorsing Talarico?...
Megyn Kelly's Bright Idea of 'Saving' Erika Kirk Sounds Like Bending the Knee...
Harmeet Dhillon Has a Question for Kimmel and 'No One Is Above the...
Abigail Spanberger Shows Virginia Who She REALLY Is When Journo Asks Her About...
Our Friend, Charlie Kirk
American Heroes of 9/11: Chief Peter Ganci, Jr.
MS NOW Finds All SORTS of Republicans Suddenly Voting for James Talarico, There's...

New Yorker's take on Jersey City shootings is just as bad as the Wall Street Journal's

As Twitchy reported after members of the Black Hebrew Israelites committed a deadly terrorist attack on a kosher supermarket in Jersey City, the Wall Street Journal posted a take so bad that the paper eventually deleted it:

Advertisement

The targeting of a Jewish supermarket for a mass shooting shook the Jewish community as well, you know.

Now Dov Hikind has found essentially the same take in the New Yorker:

So Jews moving into the neighborhood sparked a shooting spree? Were they not supposed to move there?

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement