Somali Sheriff Says Now That We've Been Hired, It Means We're Working for...
Our Gift to You This Holiday Season
As Operations Move to Columbus, Officials Vow Not to Work With ICE
Scott Adams Thanks Perma-TDS Dems for Helping Perpetuate Trump's 'Unmatched Political Skil...
Minnesota AG Keith Ellison Posts Cringe-Inducing 'Scam Stopper Showdown' Video
Photographer Critiques Vanity Fair's Photos of Trump Administration Officials
City of St. Paul Tells ICE to Cease and Desist Using City Parking...
Outrageous Stalking of ICE Ends with Epic Warning: Follow Us Again and You're...
JFK's Unknown Niece Vows to Remove Trump's Name From Building With a Pickaxe
Tara Palmeri Asks If It’s a Coincidence Trump’s DOJ Released the Epstein Photos...
Outgoing DC Police Chief Has Meltdown and a Biblical Message for the Haters
Heartbreaking Cat Theft: Amazon Delivery Man Snatches Piper by the Scruff, Leaves Family...
Sen. Van Hollen Vows to End Trump's Desecration (Then Maybe Rename It the...
When Men Run for Seats Instead of Wars: A Lament for Lost Chivalry
Bernie Sanders: The Grinch Who Blocked a Pediatric Cancer Bill for Political Leverage

Brit Hume: Spot the huge fallacy in the Washington Post's profile of Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman

The Washington Post had a piece Friday summing up what they’d learned after talking to three people familiar with Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman’s testimony in the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry this week. Vinman reportedly told members of Congress that he was advised by a top White House lawyer “not to discuss his grave concerns” outside the White House regarding President Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

Advertisement

Brit Hume noted one paragraph in the story that stood out in particular:

Anyone?

Advertisement

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement