WHOOPS! Observant 'Journalist' Aaron Rupar Is BIG MAD About Trump and the Florida...
Scott Jennings Tells Kasie Hunt That CNN Has Everything Backwards About Minnesota’s ICE...
Neighborly Violence: MN Official Says Illegal Alien Who Attacked ICE Agent Is a...
Feeling BAAAAAD? Minneapolis Official Invites Stressed Staff to ‘Healing Circle’ With ‘The...
How People Magazine Treated Timothy Busfield's Sexual Abuse Claim Versus Scott Adams' Obit...
Department of War Intends to De-Woke Stars & Stripes
New York Times Reporter Gets Nothing From Kurt Schlichter but Contempt
Man Who Stole Rifle From FBI Vehicle During Minneapolis Rioting Arrested
'I HOPE I'm Wrong'! Tom Homan Warns Walz & Frey What Might Be...
Minnesota State Representative Posting the Locations of Federal Law Enforcement Officers
Frey's Defiance: Wants Police to Battle ICE – Trump Must Invoke the Insurrection...
Alienation of Affection: Kyrsten Sinema Accused of Affair Amid U2, Taylor Swift, and...
Blinded 'Dare to Struggle' Member Who Rushed Cops Says Doctors Say It's a...
Star Trek Is Now Even Worse Than When Stacey Abrams Guest-Starred as President...
Gov. Tim Walz Assures Us Minnesota Will Remain an 'Island of Decency'

Sky News explains how President Trump's SCOTUS pick stirs fears 'he is planning an assault on democracy'

Some advice: Be wary of any journalist who starts a piece with “some say” or “critics say” — it usually means they don’t have any sources and are expressing their own opinion. Sky News U.S. correspondent James Matthews notes Saturday that “critics say the president will refuse to hand over power if he loses the election — and that the appointment is part of his plan.”

Advertisement

We’ve read the piece so you don’t have to, and there’s very, very little said about Amy Coney Barrett besides some brief biographical details. Matthews is mostly concerned about Trump not promising a peaceful transition of power “win, lose, or draw.” Assuming Trump will not leave office voluntarily if he loses (after all the mail-in ballots are finally counted) — something a lot of journalists fret about — Matthews sees the nomination of Barrett as part of Trump’s plan to stay in office; she’ll be the deciding vote when we do Bush v. Gore all over again.

Matthews writes:

All the indications from the White House and Republican-controlled Senate suggest a scramble to confirm the new Justice before the US goes to the polls.

Democrats joining the dots scream that it presents the picture of a president who won’t accept a loss at the polls, but who would steer a legal challenge towards a conservative-leaning Supreme Court in the expectation it would declare him winner — whatever the democratic will of the American people.

All of this amid his refusal to guarantee a peaceful transfer of power after the election.

Advertisement

How is it “an assault on democracy” for the duly-elected president to nominate a Supreme Court nominee of his choice? And yes, if the election makes it to the Supreme Court, we’re going to need nine justices to do their jobs.

Does Matthews know that Ruth Bader Ginsburg passed away and there’s a vacancy on the court to be filled? And the president nominates the person to fill that vacancy?

Advertisement

We’re still waiting for criminal indictments related to that “peaceful transfer of power” to the Trump administration.

Advertisement

Anyone who fears Trump is planning an assault on Democracy has believed that ever since he was inaugurated, so where’s the story?


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos