Puzzling Presidency: Scott Jennings Easily Flips ‘Who’s Running The Country?’ Question on...
By the Numbers? Pentagon Official Stuns By Saying They Miscounted Troops in Syria
Breakdown to Break Down? GOP Possibly Considering Splitting Up Spending Bill Into Smaller...
Christopher Hayes: World's Richest Man Took $190 Million Away From Kids With Cancer
Kill Bill: MSNBC’s Jen Psaki Laments ‘Threat’ Voters Pose to Unresponsive Elected Official...
Avenging Avatar: Legacy Media Grapples With Musk Making Voters the Center of the...
Chuck Todd Thinks Democracy Means Doing What Democrats Want, Even When Republicans Win
Some Experts Are More Equal Than Others: Australia Prosecutes Expert for Saying Men...
What About The Farmers and Disaster Victims? Dems Chant 'Hell No' to CR...
MSNBC Continues the Belt-Tightening: Joy Reid, Stephanie Ruhle Offered Pay Cuts As Network...
Vox Tries to Explain to Why We Praise Daniel Penny and Condemn Luigi...
George Stephanopoulos (D)efied Producer on 'Rape' Because His Job Isn't Journalism, It's A...
SHUT IT DOWN: New Continuing Resolution Fails to Pass
Rep. Richard Neal Fears the Power of a 'Tweet From Someone Who Has...
Make It Make Sense: Ron DeSantis Points Out Left's Hypocrisy on Billionaires in...

Quid pro quo? Australian government confirms refugee swap deal with Obama administration

Earlier this month, Twitchy covered the media outburst against President Trump over a phone call to Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull that became heated over a “dumb” refugee deal that the Obama administration had put in place:

Advertisement

This happened in Australia Tuesday:

9 News in Australia reports that yes, there was a direct trade-off arrangement in place, and the United States was expected to take in refugees being held by Australia in offshore detention camps — many from Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Iran, and Iraq — before Australia would take in anyone from Central America:

Fellow minister Dan Tehan wouldn’t utter the words “quid pro quo” when pressed about the US swap.

“You can call it that,” he told Sky News.

“What I would call it is both countries looking to help deal with genuine problems and fixing genuine problems when it comes to ensuring we can have in place proper border security but also deal with the issue of genuine refugees.”

“Both countries say the arrangements allow them to reject refugees they believe pose a security risk,” the report concludes.

Here is some video from the debate in Australia:

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
TRENDING ON TOWNHALL MEDIA