National security adviser H.R. McMaster about to make an impromptu statement from WH driveway on Washington Post story. pic.twitter.com/EmXI0vSYlb
— Jordan Fabian (@Jordanfabian) May 15, 2017
Following the Washington Post’s report that Donald Trump revealed classified information to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, Trump’s NatSec Adviser H.R. McMaster addressed the media:
https://twitter.com/AaronBlake/status/864256313844535296
McMaster: The story that came out tonight, as reported, is false
— Andrew Rafferty (@AndrewRafferty) May 15, 2017
"The story that came out tonight is false," NSA Director McMaster says tonight. "I was in the room it didn't happen." pic.twitter.com/tKmh2WPPBn
— Jeff Zeleny (@jeffzeleny) May 15, 2017
McMaster on Post story: "I was in the room. It didn't happen"
— John Harwood (@JohnJHarwood) May 15, 2017
https://twitter.com/PaulSzoldra/status/864256696280952832
MORE: "I was in the room," H.R. McMaster says, responding to WaPo Russia report. "It didn't happen." https://t.co/Okz2bwUl4f pic.twitter.com/PDv9nMIJrc
— CBS News (@CBSNews) May 15, 2017
So … mystery solved? Depends on whom you ask.
So, McMaster held a press conference just to repeat what he already told Wapo & refuse to take any questions? What does that accomplish?
— Stephen Gutowski (@StephenGutowski) May 15, 2017
Recommended
https://twitter.com/AaronBlake/status/864256711619694593
McMaster did NOT say no highly classified information was shared with the Russians. Full stop.
— Heidi Przybyla (@HeidiNBC) May 15, 2017
https://twitter.com/Moj_kobe/status/864260724289290240
This is not unclear unless you wish it to be:
"I was in the room," H.R. McMaster says, responding to WaPo Russia report. "It didn't happen." https://t.co/OMtp0HiLNS— Kurt Schlichter (@KurtSchlichter) May 15, 2017
Does not say what part of the story is false https://t.co/DOB1GsAecb
— John McCormack (@McCormackJohn) May 15, 2017
“as reported” doesn’t mean that the story is false
“as reported” sounds like a major aspect is true, just that the wapo didn’t get it right
— Tyler McNally (@Tyler_McNally) May 15, 2017
The story didn't claim "sources and methods" were discussed, nor did they claim military operations were discussed w/Russians.
— Drew McCoy (@_Drew_McCoy_) May 15, 2017
McMaster keeps denying something no one reporting (that methods or sources were discussed), which makes it easier to believe actual report.
— (((AG))) (@AG_Conservative) May 15, 2017
McMaster didn't put the story to rest and by going public, WaPo's anon intel sources have done even more harm if there's any truth to it
— DanRiehl (@DanRiehl) May 15, 2017
https://twitter.com/JayCaruso/status/864257810518994944
I'm not questioning his integrity. I'm questioning what he didn't say and what he left out. https://t.co/WHbnsKwW68
— Jonah Goldberg (@JonahDispatch) May 15, 2017
Very possible McMaster is looking to contain damage to Nat Security, not damage to Trump. A 60 sec statement w/no qs is not dispositive.
— Jonah Goldberg (@JonahDispatch) May 15, 2017
This story may not be going anywhere for a little bit.
https://twitter.com/BecketAdams/status/864252951577153540
Editor’s note: This post has been updated with additional text and tweets.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member