If Hillary Clinton had won in November, what are the odds we’d be seeing this argument?
The Electoral College is a national security threat, argues Matthew Olsen, former Obama counterterrorism chief https://t.co/Scl2kUcV9b
— Blake News (@blakehounshell) September 20, 2017
The subtitle of the article co-authored by a former Obama national security official is “The founding fathers never anticipated the rise of Facebook and fake news.” That sounds a little like the anti-gun activists’ “muskets” argument applied elsewhere. It was bound to happen:
This is invariably the last refuge of domestic political arguments that aren’t working. https://t.co/TYFnbOZXTX
— Charles C. W. Cooke (@charlescwcooke) September 20, 2017
Exactly.
Democrats would do away with the strongest protection of humans ever, the United States, because: Facebook. https://t.co/emxXlqyuGx
— George (@Artfull01) September 20, 2017
It’s an even dumber argument when phrased like that.
Shorter explanation: "Elections are only fair when Democrats win" https://t.co/YqCe8tCLC3
— John Howard (@SSJIndy) September 20, 2017
There’s no way this would have been an issue if Hillary Clinton had won.
https://twitter.com/molratty/status/910476281292185600
It's all empty signaling because they know there's no chance in hell a constitutional amendment gets ratified to do it. https://t.co/3tuSDA8VB4
— RBe (@RBPundit) September 20, 2017
I held the view of removing the electoral college…when I was 17 and an idiot. Now I know better. #smallstatesmatter https://t.co/rHQvIHDg8t
— Ashley (@jgsingr) September 20, 2017
https://twitter.com/Jarjarbug/status/910496664456126464
https://twitter.com/MoonbatCatnip/status/910492864743972864
Coming up next week: The Electoral College is a Public Health Risk.
— Christopher J. Scalia (@cjscalia) September 20, 2017
Oh, that goes without saying!
Join the conversation as a VIP Member