Ex-Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey suggests Elon Musk 'just release everything without filter and let people judge for themselves'

Elon Musk and Matt Taibbi’s “Twitter Files” are still a hot topic of conversation almost a week after the scoop originally dropped. Critics of Twitter’s apparent overwhelmingly unidirectional clampdown on conservative/right-wing users and reporting damaging to Democrats have hailed it as confirmation that Twitter was engaged in censorship. Liberal journalists and selective free speech advocates, meanwhile, think it’s all much ado about nothing.

Tune in for Episode 2 of The Twitter Files tomorrow!

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 3, 2022

Looks like we will need another day or so

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 4, 2022

To his credit, former Twitter CEO seems to be in favor of Musk having released the material. He just wishes that Musk had released it harder:

If the goal is transparency to build trust, why not just release everything without filter and let people judge for themselves? Including all discussions around current and future actions? Make everything public now. #TwitterFiles

— jack (@jack) December 7, 2022

Interesting.

Oh this take might get some pushback my dude. 😂

— Phil Labonte (@philthatremains) December 7, 2022

It might. Maybe just a little bit.

Obviously from defenders of Twitter’s policy of censoring reporting on the Hunter Biden laptop story that did damage to the Biden administration’s reputation:

Because that's not Elon's goal Jack…
Elon will cherry pick to better sell his desired narrative.
Money corrupts as Elon is proving once again IMO.
It's a shame $TSLA currency allowed Elon to acquire the keys of the most influential social platforms in the world. Scary TBH…

— Scott's Critical Mass (@scottsinvesting) December 7, 2022

If the goal s building trust, maybe @elonmusk should stop amplifying far right conspiracy grifters. #twitter $TSLA https://t.co/k8v5NjMQjU

— Nancy Levine Stearns 🐶 (@nancylevine) December 7, 2022

.@jack implies that if he was still in charge, he would've released the embarrassing emails showing how content was banned for political reasons. This, of course, ignores the fact that it happened on Jack's watch, and he did nothing about it.

Where was trust & transparency then?

— Joel M. Petlin (@Joelmpetlin) December 7, 2022

It’s not like he was in charge and got—or should have gotten—weekly updates from his direct reports.

Wait—

— Laurel Van Driest (@lvandriest) December 7, 2022

Welp.

@jack – with all due respect, you should probably sit this one out. Your lack of involvement and inability to manage your company was a huge part of the problem. And now, you take DAYS to offer what might be considered a reasonable question? Why?

— Lou Hutchison (@OrthogonalMind) December 7, 2022