Walz: Somalis' Great-Grandchildren Will Be Here When That Orange Clown Is in the...
We Stopped Celebrating Men Like Tim Tebow — And Society Is Poorer For...
And? Sheridan Gorman’s Killer Is Developmentally Impaired and Can’t Read or Write
Former 'Conservatives' With Trump Derangement Syndrome Are Paying for Nationwide 'No Kings...
New York Magazine Breaks Down ICE Facility Ambush by Antifa That ‘Went Awry’
James Woods Tells 'Worthless Hack' John Thune He Had ONE Job
Great Downgrade: Men Went from War Heroes and Cathedral Builders to 'Go-Getters' Who...
Dem Sen. Mazie Hirono Makes a Great Case for Why the 'No Kings'...
Billionaire vs. Socialist: Mark Cuban Schools Bernie Sanders on Who Really Pays the...
Elderly Canadian Offered Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) for Fracture — She Climbed...
Jim Acosta Got a Good Laugh From No Kings Protester's 'Very Clever' Sign...
CAN'T Make It Up! 'Country That Literally Has a King Is Protesting Against...
Democrat Shutdown Continues as President Trump Works to Make America Safe Again
WaPo Community Note Nuked for Post on Athletes Who Have Been 'Excluded From...
Western Lensman Has a Biden Flashback the 'No Kings' Lefties Applauded (Translation: They'...

Speech, schmeech: The Bulwark conserves conservatism by arguing that 'actually, de-platforming is good'

Well, we certainly couldn’t’ve predicted this hot take from the Bulwark … could you?

Advertisement

Conserving Conservatism by arguing that limiting speech is ackshually a good thing:

We have seen the societal benefits of social media and we have seen the societal costs. It would be madness not to try to decrease the latter and increase the former.

Such attempts will be imperfect and ongoing. They will require some actions taken independently by private companies and some actions taken by government. There will be constant re-balancing.

But anyone who says that tech companies must simply throw their hands in the air and let the masses do what they will is either a salesman, a nihilist, or a fool.

And what does approach to speech this make the Bulwark?

It’s not a good look.

Why, right here on Twitter! And poorly. As usual.

And what happens when someone at Twitter or another social media platform decides that the Bulwark has expressed one too many bad opinions?

Advertisement

Guessing they won’t be so enthusiastic about deplatforming then.

If Donald Trump really wants to take a page from the fascist’s playbook, he should spend more time reading the Bulwark.

True story.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement