Eric Swalwell Says Dem Congress Will Subpoena FBI Agents Who Refuse to Come...
Jim Acosta Laughably Worries That CNN Will Become a Propaganda Network Under New...
Tim Miller Left GOP Over Trump… But Defending Hasan Piker’s Misogyny and ‘America...
Idaho Democrat Tells Parents: Kids Belong to the State Once They Walk Into...
NATO Ratio: Flubbed NYT Iran War Headline Creates Groundswell of Acronym Acrimony Online
Google Is Free: X BODIES Obama-Era Diplomat For Asking and (Wrongly) Answering His...
Biden Walks Through an Airport: Case Closed, He Was Never Senile, You Conspiracy...
Fenway Erupts in Boos: Healey & Wu Get a Brutal, Well-Deserved Reception on...
Don't Back a Florida Man (or Woman) Into a Corner—And Don't Commit Crime...
TIME Mag Review of Springsteen's HISTORIC 'Resistance' Concert Couldn't Possibly Be More O...
HuffPost's Attempt to Create a Good Friday Outrage Cycle About Pete Hegseth Is...
Ozempic (Allegedly) Gov. Celebrates National Walking Day While Chicago Mourns Teen Shot De...
Deportation? We Don't Do That: Illegals Squat for Decades, Their 'American' Kids Try...
DNC Stomps on Multiple Rakes in Rush to Slam Trump Over 'Affordable' Health...
Let's Check on How Many Network Evening Newscasts Mentioned the Fraud Arrests in...

Speech, schmeech: The Bulwark conserves conservatism by arguing that 'actually, de-platforming is good'

Well, we certainly couldn’t’ve predicted this hot take from the Bulwark … could you?

Advertisement

Conserving Conservatism by arguing that limiting speech is ackshually a good thing:

We have seen the societal benefits of social media and we have seen the societal costs. It would be madness not to try to decrease the latter and increase the former.

Such attempts will be imperfect and ongoing. They will require some actions taken independently by private companies and some actions taken by government. There will be constant re-balancing.

But anyone who says that tech companies must simply throw their hands in the air and let the masses do what they will is either a salesman, a nihilist, or a fool.

And what does approach to speech this make the Bulwark?

It’s not a good look.

Why, right here on Twitter! And poorly. As usual.

And what happens when someone at Twitter or another social media platform decides that the Bulwark has expressed one too many bad opinions?

Advertisement

Guessing they won’t be so enthusiastic about deplatforming then.

If Donald Trump really wants to take a page from the fascist’s playbook, he should spend more time reading the Bulwark.

True story.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement