YAAAS! Scott Jennings Has Just TWO WORDS for Lefties Who Think They Can...
(Not So) SHOCKING! Judges FOR SALE in Ohio Immigration Court - Exclusive BOMBSHELL...
Window-Licking LEFTY Bodied in the Comments for Comparing MN Somali Daycares to Church...
BOO and YAH! Townhall Media Announces the One and ONLY Larry O’Connor As...
Cynical Publius 'Fixes' Brian Tyler Cohen's Virginia Dem Utopia Post With Savagely SPOT-ON...
Set Phasers to HA HA HA! William Shatner Teams UP with Stephen Miller...
OWNED! Former Reaganite KT McFarland Kindly Schools TF Out of Keith Olbermann After...
Word Warrior: Scott Jennings Scoffs at Cameron Kasky’s Language Limiting Edict on Saying...
CNN Anchor Wants Us to Focus on the Real Victims of Sunday’s MN...
Dem Podcaster Jennifer Welch Wants Her Team to Go After Jesse Watters and...
Upping the Rhetoric: Eric Holder Calls Trump a Dictator Clinging to Power With...
Co-Founder of Church Stormed by Don Lemon BODIES the Democrats
Jill Filipovic Appalled by Photo of ICE ‘Marching Half-Naked Elderly People Out Into...
MN Could End ICE Raids Tomorrow: Just Stop Harboring Criminal Illegals and Cooperate...
St. Paul Hotels Cancel Reservations Due to ‘Heightened Security Concerns’

NYT caught pretending they didn't publish 'bizarre and embarrassing conspiratorial claim' about Trump on their front page [screenshot]

Yesterday, Donald Trump posted a video message on his Twitter account:

Advertisement

And that go some people to thinking — about how they could undermine it.

They frequently like to cite The Science™ when they want to push back against something he says, and they could’ve opted to go that route in this case with his comments about a COVID19 cure.

But they didn’t go that route. They went this one instead:

Gotta be a green screen, you guys.

Nice.

Well anyway, you’ll no doubt be shocked to learn that Donald Trump was apparently not, in fact, standing in front of a green screen:

The New York Times must’ve been pretty shocked, too. So shocked that they forgot to add an editor’s note or correction when they deleted speculation about the “digital backdrop” from Maggie Haberman and Katie Thomas’ story:

Advertisement

How do you like that? So uncharacteristic of the New York Times, what with all their journalistic integrity.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos