Martyr Makeover: MS NOW Alters Pretti Photo to Transform the Late Nurse Into...
Bros and Ros: Over-the-Top Leftist’s Lengthy Lecture to Khanna Is All ‘Pimp’ and...
Dem Angie Craig Sees Weak Republicans As Her Cue to Talk Tough on...
Illiterate, Sniveling Buffoon Nick Shirley’s Fraudulent Videos Have Gotten People Killed
Fake But Accurate: Journos and Other Assorted Propagandists Run With AI Enhanced Pretti...
Woman Claims ‘Real Masculinity’ Is Fleeing the Right
'Lying Oxygen Thieves' of Climate Defiance Branch Out From Climate Insanity to Anti-Ice...
Bill Kristol: There Was No ‘Unrest’ in Minneapolis Until ICE and CBP Showed...
Friend Murdered by Feds—Send Coffee Money: X Users Slam Doctor's Venmo Plea After...
Nurse Says He Won’t Give Anesthesia to Republicans Undergoing Surgery
The Left's Real Motivation: Not Loving Illegals, Just Despising Popular Kids Who Shoved...
Don't Buy the Martyr Myth: Pretti and Good Chose Confrontation with Law Enforcement
NY Gov. Kathy Hochul Posts a Video With Her Pro Tips on Shoveling...
Moms Trading Playdates for Bulletproof Vests: 'Protecting' Kids by Using Them as...
Minneapolis Insurrection Proves It: If Trump Blinks on ICE, the Left Wins Open...

'WTF???' Slate plummets to 'new low' with this demented take on the Christchurch massacre

At this point, we’d be more surprised to not see an awful take from Slate. And yet, somehow, we’re still amazed by this one on the deadly mosque shootings in Christchurch:

Advertisement

Rachel Withers writes:

Who is responsible for the terrorist attack that killed at least 50 New Zealanders as they prayed in their mosques? Looked at one way, the answer is simple: The shooter alone bears the guilt for his crimes. But the picture is wider than that.

No, it’s really not. But Rachel’s hellbent on implicating a lot more people than the shooter. Namely, “all white Australians.”

So why do I feel so guilty? And why am I so angry not just at the obvious targets, but at my country?

Could it be because you’re demented and self-loathing? Actually, yes:

I’m a white Australian. I know that blaming myself and my cohort is illogical, but I can’t escape the feeling that all of white Australia is implicated in the deaths—a white majority that has fomented and let foment hate. Though he may have labeled himself a European, [the shooter] was an Aussie through and through, growing up in a country town north of Sydney, steeped in mainstream Australian racism and our particular national brand of Islamophobia. He grew up in the same Murdoch-controlled mass media environment that the rest of us did—one that recently trashed Islam 2,891 times in a single year—and under the same governments, with prime ministers who have repeatedly stoked anti-Muslim sentiment for votes, with one major party making it central to their electoral strategy.

You might think that this is all too strong, that placing at least some of the blame on white Australia is a kind of self-centered masochism, that blaming a nation’s culture for the sins of a citizen is like blaming humanity for the crimes of one man. But it’s better than the alternative, of saying “#notallAustralians” and looking the other way, thinking, well, there’s nothing I can do.

White Australians may not be strictly answerable for [the shooter’s] crime, but we have some big questions to ask ourselves. If you’re an Australian and reading this makes you feel defensive, you should ask them now.

Advertisement

If Rachel wants to self-flagellate for crimes someone else committed, that’s her prerogative. But to suggest that this is a “white Australian” problem is incredibly disingenuous. Not to mention seriously messed up.

It most certainly is not.

Rachel hates herself. And she’s taking it out on people who did nothing wrong.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement