Fresh hell! Get your fresh hell here!
We missed this yesterday, but no way are we gonna let Ari Melber — an alleged “legal correspondent — off the hook for this:
"The 2nd amendment does not apply to AR-15s, it doesn't apply to assault-style weapons… that's a legal fact" – @AriMelber on our view of 2nd amendment being "defrauded" by special interests: pic.twitter.com/FM3pQjeXtJ
— TheBeat w/Ari Melber (@TheBeatWithAri) February 26, 2018
Beg your pardon?
Honest question: Would it kill the talking heads at MSNBC to learn what the hell they’re talking about before they just shoot their mouths off?
This is nonsense.
— Greenland Liberation Force???? (@jasonmn) February 27, 2018
Well, that's wrong.
— Deplorable Brian (@BDSoCal) February 27, 2018
That analysis is wrong.
— Greg Hunter (@GregTheTourist) February 27, 2018
This is a lie. https://t.co/SODYSS8MQT
— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) February 27, 2018
https://twitter.com/CruzModel4/status/968514047711756289
https://twitter.com/Yottr94/status/968600674715033600
Apparently confused about the meaning of "legal fact"
— Dusty (@dustopian) February 27, 2018
Can you point me to the case where this was decided? Other than Melber v Reality.
— C.D. Moore (@FredasBoss) February 27, 2018
https://twitter.com/TerryOgolf/status/968599954292813824
"The 1st Amendment does not apply to Samsung Galaxy S9s" because SCOTUS has never adjudicated a case about Galaxy S9s. "That's a fact" https://t.co/tKaf13cSZk
— Heimish Conservative (@HeimishCon) February 27, 2018
Recommended
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed, except for AR-15s which are assault-style weapons, that's a legal fact you special interest dummy https://t.co/dV8pHYMLyv
— Anthony Bialy (@AnthonyBialy) February 27, 2018
Actually.. while the court has never specifically heard a case dealing with "assault weapons", the Court said in Heller "The #2A extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the Founding." https://t.co/BUUKncioEZ
— Cam Edwards (@CamEdwards) February 27, 2018
They are jumping the shark now. They aren't even hiding it anymore.
— HSJC Sister?❌ (@Peaches_Sabrina) February 27, 2018
Hey Ari, are you up for a thought exercise?
https://twitter.com/seanagnew/status/968596715434594310
MSNBC didn’t exist when the Constitution was written, either. We’d better ban it just to be safe.
Editor’s note: This post has been updated with an additional tweet.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member