SCIENCE! Just for Fun Here Are 5 of My Favorite Climate Change Doomsday...
Sheldon Whitehouse DRAGGED for Unhinged, Paranoid AF Thread About 'Far Right' Declaring Wa...
Just WOW: Chris Murphy Justifies Political Violence (Murder?!) and Scott Jennings Ain't Ha...
'MAGA is the Republican Party': Mitt Romney Predicts JD Vance Will Be The...
Monday Morning Meme Madness
Spoil Sport: Campaign Manager Blames Trump Culture for Sporting Shows Dropping Kamala
January 6 Committee Democrat Won’t Refuse Biden Pardon Despite Saying He Broke No...
Definitely Defeated: Kamala Serves Up Repetitive Word Salad at Annual DNC Holiday Dinner
Trophy Treat: Pop-Tarts Unwraps Tasty Toasty College Football Bowl Prize
Host of Cringemas Present: Celebrating Our Final Kamala-Cackling Holiday Season
State of the Chart: Chris Cillizza Blind to Fox News Post-Election Viewership Rise
Poll Position: Pollster Who Had Kamala Winning Iowa is Refuting Election Interference Clai...
Kamala Eyeing Full-Court Shot at Presidency Despite California Governorship Layup
ABC News Sends ‘Regrets’ But No Apology for Trump Rape Lies Spread by...
Seven Years Ago, Disney Enacted Order 66 on the Movie Industry (but We...

'What the actual f*ck?' NBC News SHREDDED for indulging TWISTED 'thought experiment'

For some reason, NBC News saw fit to indulge this scorching-hot take:

Advertisement

Nice ratio, huh?

In his “thought experiment,” alleged bioethicist Travis Rieder writes:

Although culturally controversial, the scientific half of this position is fairly well-established. Several years ago, scientists showed that having a child, especially for the world’s wealthy, is one of the worst things you can do for the environment. That data was recycled this past summer in a paper showing that none of the activities most likely to reduce individuals’ carbon footprints are widely discussed.

The second, moral aspect of the view — that perhaps we ought to have fewer children — is also being taken seriously in many circles. Indeed, I have written widely on the topic myself.

It’s certainly not being taken seriously in any circles we hang out in. And just because Travis has written extensively on the subject doesn’t mean he knows what the hell he’s talking about.

If you buy this view of responsibility, you might eventually admit that having many children is wrong, or at least morally suspect, for standard environmental reasons: Having a child imposes high emissions on the world, while the parents get the benefit. So like with any high-cost luxury, we should limit our indulgence.

Advertisement

More:

https://twitter.com/CounterMoonbat/status/930821444795109377

In other words:

https://twitter.com/BecketAdams/status/930823812966502400

This kind of crap will never not be awful.

https://twitter.com/wupton/status/930824744487747585

https://twitter.com/FBillMcMorris/status/930828072961691648

Advertisement

How devoted can Rieder really be to saving the earth if he insists on polluting it with such intellectual garbage?

https://twitter.com/AmyOtto8/status/930821858068389889

What’s the point of any of this?

Editor’s note: This post has been updated with additional tweets.

***

Update:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement