Chelsea Clinton is absolutely appalled, you guys. We know, we know … what else is new, right?
Well, anyway, this time, it’s a Michigan House bill that’s ruffling her feathers. Her feathers were just ruffled a few years late:
HT @RBPundit pic.twitter.com/jh5WAjrIPD
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) September 15, 2017
So, the question is "What message board or email list is Chelsea getting 3 year old articles from?" and "Why?" https://t.co/hoMX1TTUk6
— RBe (@RBPundit) September 15, 2017
Another question: Why’s she pushing a debunked story?
And it's apparently not true.
So @ChelseaClinton is literally spreading 3 year old fake news around. https://t.co/rO0bXh3rNT
— RBe (@RBPundit) September 15, 2017
Oopsie.
Hi Chelsea. The story was also false.https://t.co/62KdbTRmVT https://t.co/o0tWD1n18E
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) September 15, 2017
Hi Chelsea! The bill didn't do what you said it does. So it's STILL not appalling and you're STILL wrong.https://t.co/Ne9FnFDKBb https://t.co/crNUW21ArT
— RBe (@RBPundit) September 15, 2017
Perhaps most appalling is the 2 second investigatory search that debunks the claim, and neither Chelsea, nor her followers took the time pic.twitter.com/5gqHSCIF93
— Chet Cannon (@Chet_Cannon) September 15, 2017
After getting called out, Chelsea deleted her tweet — and promptly got called out for that.
Ah. @ChelseaClinton deleted the tweet.
The question remains: Who sent her the article and why? What were they trying to stir up? https://t.co/OJA9wcDvBT
— RBe (@RBPundit) September 15, 2017
Recommended
And it's gone. Would love an explanation on this one @ChelseaClinton
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) September 15, 2017
Ask and you shall receive:
Hi Stephen! That such a bill was passed anytime is appalling & 2014 not so long ago. Deleted the original to avoid confusion. Still appalled https://t.co/oLurfbdENg
— Chelsea Clinton (@ChelseaClinton) September 15, 2017
Yes, thankfully. I shared it because it is appalling that it was ever passed (in 2014). Deleted it because of confusion that it happened now
— Chelsea Clinton (@ChelseaClinton) September 15, 2017
Hi Stephen-deleted it b/c I didn't want to cause confusion about the date. I don't think any LGBTQ person should ever be denied any service.
— Chelsea Clinton (@ChelseaClinton) September 15, 2017
Hey, we didn’t say it was a good explanation …
So fake but accurate then.
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) September 15, 2017
Basically.
Snopes already debunked most of this.
Maybe you should have checked with Veritt first before tweeting this?https://t.co/itMC8flAsl … https://t.co/LEn62g1gcT
— Pradheep J. Shanker (@Neoavatara) September 15, 2017
If Chelsea would have used a Verrit code, sharing unverified fake news wouldn't have happened.
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) September 15, 2017
Ha! Maybe next time. Or maybe the truth just isn’t that important to her.
The Clintons don't do ANYTHING in public without an agenda.
— RBe (@RBPundit) September 15, 2017
That sounds about right.
So she either went hunting for any news she could use to scoff at conservatives or someone sent her the story so she could do it.
— RBe (@RBPundit) September 15, 2017
She deleted it, but here was the tweet.
We all make mistakes, but…still. pic.twitter.com/ymEM7tHi7i
— Pradheep J. Shanker (@Neoavatara) September 15, 2017
It was a mistake, but it wasn't an innocent one.
She wanted to stir up a reaction. Why? And why now? https://t.co/Y6BP4dyQig
— RBe (@RBPundit) September 15, 2017
Because she can.
Dear @ChelseaClinton, please repeat after me:
"Sorry everyone, the story was old and the bill didn't even do what was claimed in the story"
— RBe (@RBPundit) September 15, 2017
Eh, admitting you were wrong (or lied) is for peasants.
Anyway, @ChelseaClinton will not correct the record on the false article she tweeted out because the false information was the agenda. https://t.co/dwgLqPPYZW
— RBe (@RBPundit) September 15, 2017
And not only that, but as far as the actual bill is concerned:
Worse, the bill Chelsea Clinton claims would've let "EMTs Refuse Treatment To Gay People" was a garden variety RFRA https://t.co/nhtSEF7IgF
— Alex Griswold (@HashtagGriswold) September 15, 2017
Did you actually read the bill?
It is VERY similar to the RFRA…which your father signed. https://t.co/lpMaQovt2Z
— Pradheep J. Shanker (@Neoavatara) September 15, 2017
Welp, that’s awkward.
Again @ChelseaClinton …if you have a problem with such laws, I would like to see criticism of your father first. https://t.co/2l8BKLOmHu
— Pradheep J. Shanker (@Neoavatara) September 15, 2017
Don’t hold your breath.
You see how these fucking people work?
They just can not be honest.
— RBe (@RBPundit) September 15, 2017
Join the conversation as a VIP Member