Have you ever thought to yourself, “Gee, wouldn’t it be great if I could keep track of all the Jews, all in one place?” Well, the wait is over. The New York Times is here to help:
https://twitter.com/mcmoynihan/status/642042047650787328
No, it’s true:
https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/642036827977875456
Hey, thanks, New York Times! We knew we could count on you!
*clap*…*clap*…*clap*… pic.twitter.com/bXObEZKzGK
— Brandon Morse (@TheBrandonMorse) September 10, 2015
Jew Tracker 9000 is now my pet name for NYT. https://t.co/P0wDXh7KKf
— Brandon Morse (@TheBrandonMorse) September 10, 2015
My favorite part of the NYT Jew tracker is the part where specifically track how loyal to the political party the Jews are
— PoliMath (@politicalmath) September 10, 2015
https://twitter.com/SethAMandel/status/642038247711997952
https://twitter.com/lachlan/status/642043295707828225
We’ll give the Times this much: They always manage to find a way to top themselves.
NYT keeping tabs of all those Jews and their Jew-y votes. Never know what Jewery they're up to http://t.co/Fpk8fjaX6v pic.twitter.com/oVhMic2Npu
— PoliMath (@politicalmath) September 10, 2015
https://twitter.com/SethAMandel/status/642037903519035393
@SethAMandel GP And Jewy states, at least in the Senate version.
— The Gormogons (@Gormogons) September 10, 2015
https://twitter.com/LDoren/status/642040218736963584
NYTimes categorizes Senators as Jewish? or Not…for Iran vote. I can't wait for the Gay votes…. http://t.co/eieqMLIQBN
— Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) September 10, 2015
WITAF. https://t.co/hNtn6QH6fl
— Sarah (@mamaswati) September 10, 2015
@TheBrandonMorse this NYT piece is pretty disgusting. Basically saying only Dem opposition is due to Jewish roots or jew pressure.
— Yaakov Labowitz (@yaakovlabowitz) September 10, 2015
https://twitter.com/Yair_Rosenberg/status/642037505957711872
https://twitter.com/Yair_Rosenberg/status/642037980442587136
https://twitter.com/RQA/status/642038295787106304
@nytimes @JewishJournal When did publishing lists of Jews come back into style?
— righteous axe (@righteousaxe) September 10, 2015
@nytimes Yellow marks seems appropriate for the dual-loyalty accusation being implied here.
— Mark Jacobs (@mr_markjacobs) September 10, 2015
.@mr_markjacobs Yeah, we're calling you out, @nytimes. The reason you ONLY put Jews in your box is….?
— Lori LowenthalMarcus (@LoriLMarcus) September 10, 2015
https://twitter.com/MoonbatCatnip/status/642043059241357313
https://twitter.com/Plate0fShrimp/status/642045410446606336
@nytimes Why didn't you just mark them with the Star of David?
— NewEnglandDevil (@NewEnglandDevil) September 10, 2015
@LoriLMarcus @nytimes is not even trying to hide their institutional antisemitism any longer. Are they that ignorant? @Sulliview
— Mark Jacobs (@mr_markjacobs) September 10, 2015
https://twitter.com/juliakite/status/642044015198793729
https://twitter.com/LDoren/status/642043288329981953
Yyyyup. What a crap show. https://t.co/cDE9rS475X
— Brandon Morse (@TheBrandonMorse) September 10, 2015
Time for a slogan update, don’t you think?
@TheBrandonMorse @politicalmath alternately, "All the Jews that's fit to print," because "The Jewspaper of record" could give the wrong idea
— Jason Hart (@jasonahart) September 10, 2015
***
Update:
‘It’s still disgusting’: NYT sneakily alters ‘Jew tracker’ piece, doesn’t fool anyone
Join the conversation as a VIP Member