Have you noticed that yesterday’s deadly attack in Strasbourg seems to have kind of fallen off the radar today? We can’t for the life of us figure out why that might be.

Maybe it’s because, as the New York Times says, the gunman’s motive “remains unclear”:

… Did anyone tell the New York Times that? Because the actual article hints pretty strongly at a decidedly clear motive:


Assuming the witnesses’ accounts are accurate, the motive isn’t so much unclear as it is … pretty damn clear.

Ah, that’s right. We forgot.