Brit Hume didn’t need a monologue.
Then again, he never really does as the wry and dry Fox News pundit doesn't often mince words when commenting on trending stories in the media.
Case in point...
Paula Devlin, part of the 11 who wanted an insanity acquittal, is now saying the mostly female panel understood the trial as a turning point that could “make it better for other women.” That’s not how a murder jury is supposed to talk. The question in Plymouth was whether Clancy was criminally responsible for killing her three children — not whether a verdict could double as a policy statement for moms everywhere.
Watch:
During her next media tour stop, juror Paula Devlin says the mostly female jury knew the Lindsay Clancy trial could create change to “make it better for other women.”
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) September 13, 2026
“We knew that this was a turning point, and this would be something that could change something to make it… pic.twitter.com/4aBlCDzeUx
After a week of blaming the lone holdout for refusing to play along, this is the tell: some of those jurors weren’t just weighing evidence. They were thinking about the message.
Uh oh. https://t.co/SVeBKY4vgT
— Brit Hume (@brithume) September 13, 2026
Short.
Simple.
Accurate.
These jurors, especially Devlin who admitted they were using this trial not to determine justice but for a political agenda, must be held accountable.
Recommended
The Clancy jurors only made it worse for children. https://t.co/Qsb6rERiUg
— Eileen (@SaveGodsChildre) September 14, 2026
But girl power and stuff.
She's too stupid to understand what she just admitted to.
— StormyT 🌿 (@OutLikeA_Lamb) September 14, 2026
Which begs the question yet again: how did these people actually get on this jury? What was the prosecutor thinking?
Political activism over law. Typical Liberals. Revolting.
— DrBunnyMD (@DrBunnyMD) September 13, 2026
Here's the irony. She and her fellow "not guilty" jurors sent a note to the judge protesting the holdout juror for not following the evidence as the judge instructed, asking for his removal. The very thing many of them were clearly doing themselves.
— Lex Jurgen (@Lex_Jurgen) September 14, 2026
So you voted not guilty to help women in the future...
— Jennifer Coffindaffer (@CoffindafferFBI) September 14, 2026
Please keep talking.
If this stands as is, if these women are not held accountable for politicizing their role as jurors, we can say goodbye to fair trials with a jury of our peers. Not to mention, why would any American want to serve on a jury after all of this mess? Doxxing? Threats?
Shame on these women.
============================================================
Related:
BOOM! James Talarico Demands Racism Condemnation From Ken Paxton — What Happened Next Is LEGENDARY
Lindsay Clancy's Attorneys’ Wife Has a Big Mouth and Says LOTS of Stupid Stuff She SHOULDN'T (Pics)
Drunk or Just NUTS? YOU Decide! CEO Brutally Calls Amy Acton OUT Over Her Vivek Ramaswamy Texas Lie
God Was Watching Over Us: WI Gubernatorial Candidate Tom Tiffany Safe After Emergency Water Landing
Talarico HOAX: FCC Chair Brendan Carr Schooling University Dems on 'Equal Time' Is a GLORIOUS Thing
============================================================
Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting exposing the radical left and woke media? Support our work so we can keep bringing you the truth.
Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member