Bret Stephens decided to address the haters about his column that caused enough butthurt among the climate change cult to deplete the ozone layer:
https://twitter.com/BretStephensNYT/status/859220242119237634
From Bret Stephens via The New York Times:
My first column, “Climate of Complete Certainty,” was published last week, and drew more than 1,800 comments on the column and on Facebook. I’m answering some of them here, edited lightly for length and clarity …
He went on to answer a few questions very calmly and politely, which means the climate change mob couldn’t wait to attack him, again:
https://twitter.com/annietheblank/status/859226032146132993
“No offense but” … nothing good ever comes after the word “but” in that sentence.
No offense, but why does the left shove non scientists like Al Gore, Leo DiCaprio, Bill Nye and Hollywood down the public's throat?
— Mike (@mike4libertyCA) May 2, 2017
Why are you qualified to answer "climate questions"? Perhaps u can answer questions on Bose Einstein Condensates while you're at it?
— Saurabh Gupta (@saurabhguptasg) May 2, 2017
Wow. Bret does his best to politely and thoroughly answer questions about his own thoughts on climate change and gets attacked for it.
Again.
It’s like clockwork with these folks.
Dear Bret. Your answers are fine, if a little scattered. But "everyone freak out now" debases the public conversation you're a part of.
— Mark Shahinian (@MarkShahinian) May 2, 2017
Oh look, it’s the word “but” …
Recommended
His critics are responsible for that. Bret was trying to open debate. That is not allowed by the religion of climate change. It's heresy.
— Stacey (@ScotsFyre) May 2, 2017
Bingo.
Wow Mr Stephens you are a glutton for punishment. Stay strong!
— (((I Can't Even))) (@szysgt) May 2, 2017
And this time, Far Left Nuts, read the fucking column, please.
— Sleve McDichael (@SeahawkBurrrton) May 2, 2017
*gasp* How DARE you ask them to read something! White male … err … raccoon privilege!
Now u see how crazy those people are??
— EXTRAordinaryPundit (@faiburns) May 2, 2017
We do, we do!
How do sensible people not see this as a sensible article by a sensible columnist? It's almost as if political beliefs trumps facts.
— Brotherless Jersey (@SFlipp) May 2, 2017
Because climate change isn’t about facts, it’s about a doctrine and if you dare speak out against their religion you must be destroyed.
It’s all they know.
Related:
CLASSY: SJW ‘magazine’ deletes RACIST tweet comparing aging white people to rotting bananashttps://t.co/PvCF2ZOUOV
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) May 2, 2017
Join the conversation as a VIP Member