Ooooers … radical.
"…an unapologetically radical, progressive vision for justice in America" #WomensMarch https://t.co/zzz0ycyzGt
— Women's March (@womensmarch) January 13, 2017
Personally we think the diversified photo Slate is using for the tweet is precious; look at the two dudes. Well wait, there could be three guys in this photo, it’s sorta hard to tell these days.
You can likely guess what it says without giving Slate the click it’s desperate for; the Women’s March platform champions infanticide on the government dollar and plays “who’s the bigger victim” all throughout. The only groups of people they don’t seem to care about are those who disagree with them … ain’t that convenient?
Lots of ‘leaders’ in the movement are championing the march:
This is #WhyIMarch. Tell me why you'll be supporting @womensmarch on Saturday Jan 21 in Washington DC and around the country! #WomensMarch pic.twitter.com/kPKIi93JMF
— Sally Kohn (@sallykohn) January 12, 2017
Inclusion UNLESS you’re a woman who disagrees with Sally’s agenda. If you disagree NO INCLUSION FOR YOU!
We work peacefully while recognizing there is no true peace without justice and equity for all. Join the movement! @womensmarch #WomensMarch
— Debra Messing (@DebraMessing) January 13, 2017
True peace, that’s cute.
RT if you agree! #WMWArt: @KimothyJoy pic.twitter.com/9nFOXqwGRL
— Women's March (@womensmarch) January 11, 2017
Unity! Unless you’re one of those evil MEN … it’s ridiculous they can’t see their own sexism. Can you IMAGINE the firestorm if men decided to have a Men’s March and released propaganda like this?
They don’t want equality, they want revenge. Never forget that.
Related:
‘Fascism with vaginas’; Jenna Jameson asks this question about feminism, triggers the lot of ’em
Who’s makin’ sammiches?! Women’s March devolves into catfight over, wait for it … racism (ha!)
Join the conversation as a VIP Member