Cowntraversy: Google Street Values Your Privacy, if You're a Cow
A Murder of Jim Crows: Schumer and Dems Ignorantly Invoke Segregation Laws As...
WaPo: White House Ballroom Will Set in Stone Trump’s ‘Regal Conception of the...
Map Flap: CNN’s Laura Coates Calls SCOTUS VRA Ruling ‘Illogical’ As Dems Double...
Family Federally Indicted for Assault on TPUSA Reporter at Anti-ICE Demonstration
Mahmoud Khalil Tells New York Magazine He Misses His Old Life (Let’s Send...
Ann Arbor Removes Last Neighborhood Watch Sign, Ending Part of City’s Troubled Racist...
Newsom Press Office Has Total Meltdown Over Supreme Court Gerrymandering Ruling and Florid...
ABC News: SCOTUS Considering Whether Trump 'Unlawfully Ordered' Migrants Sent Home
Maine Dem Senate Candidate With Swastika Ink Furious Supreme Court Won't Force Race-Based...
Marc Elias’ Interpretation of SCOTUS VRA Decision Is Intellectually Dishonest and Wrong
Local News Says FBI Used a Battering Ram to Raid a Daycare in...
She Seems Nice: Seattle’s Socialist Nepo Mayor Cackles 'BYE' as Wealth Flees Her...
Obama Already Knows the Motive for Today's SCOTUS Ruling, Still Looking for WHCD...
Sen. Raphael Warnock: SCOTUS Has Gutted the Protections Civil Rights Protesters Spilled Bl...

KABLOOEY! Newt Gingrich WRECKS the New York Times, asks them 7 questions they can't (WON'T) answer

Newt Gingrich has had it up to HERE with the New York Times, much like many other Americans. No other paper consistently pretends to be above the general public quite as much as the Times; talk about smug elitists.

Advertisement

Newt has seven questions for them:

The questions included (we answered a few of them with our own educated guesses):

1. Does the Times have any reporters, editors, or columnists who will say they voted for Trump, and has it hired any new ones? (gonna guess NO)

2. Has it hired any reporters who are even Republicans? (HA HA HA HA HA)

3. Has it changed its policies that allowed journalists to express their opinions about the events and people they covered in their news stories? (NOPE NOPE NOPE)

4. Will it ask the Pulitzer Prize board to withdraw, and its reporters to return, any prizes that might be awarded for news stories that contained reporters’ personal opinions? (Psh, not even)

5. Have its editors retracted misleading news headlines that expressed opinions — such as the paper’s coverage of Trump’s tax returns? (Going out on a limb here and saying no)

6. Has it fired reporters who admitted  to writing politically motivated “news” stories and encouraged interview subjects to talk to them so they could stop Trump? (God no, HA! That would mean the paper has integrity)

7.  Has it retracted its shameful election-eve front-page story “reporting” on Trump’s innermost thoughts and feelings, virtually every sentence of which is filled with reporters’ opinions and speculations–featuring claims like “he is struggling to suppress his bottomless need for attention”? (And another resounding no)

Advertisement

Pretty sure the New York Times won’t be responding to Newt anytime soon.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement