'What the f*ck, CNN?': Wording of ISIS tweet draws angry backlash

Oh, CNN.

#ISIS may have had reasons to kill the Jordanian pilot by burning him instead of beheading him http://t.co/oEEcWcPm3l pic.twitter.com/K0jSsMf0Pv

— CNN (@CNN) February 6, 2015

Pro tip: When tweeting about ISIS, don’t appear as if you are rationalizing burning a man alive.

https://twitter.com/BlackbeardQAR/status/563551016759881728

https://twitter.com/TheLadyJaye/status/563550642174558209

https://twitter.com/Halpin_12/status/563553143540027393

https://twitter.com/TheLadyJaye/status/563553466875150337

https://twitter.com/Halpin_12/status/563554778366496769

https://twitter.com/LiliaKilmer/status/563549056949968897

@LiliaKilmer @CNN read the article. That's not what they're saying

— Emily (@EmilyBeee) February 6, 2015

@LiliaKilmer @CNN You realize they mean ISIS burnt him because they might have benefited from it instead of beheading him. #SMH

— Ian (@Anabsurdturtle) February 6, 2015

https://twitter.com/LiliaKilmer/status/563550321444540419

@LiliaKilmer @CNN Well it's not like people can just ignore it. It's a point that needs to be discussed.

— Ian (@Anabsurdturtle) February 6, 2015

https://twitter.com/LiliaKilmer/status/563551141154140161

@LiliaKilmer I don't understand how this correlates to Fox News at all?

— Ian (@Anabsurdturtle) February 6, 2015

Really. Of all the cable news networks, Fox is probably the least likely to rationalize the actions of ISIS.

But progs gotta prog.