The lapdog news media has covered for the Obama administration on the Benghazi scandal since the attacks occurred in September. They are now using General David Petraeus’ sex scandal as a means to further avoid the subject.
Does it seem like the media is putting Benghazi on the back-burner in favor of dissecting Gen Petraeus' love life? Priorities…just saying
— Jocelyn Lanham (@Hosselyn) November 11, 2012
Sophomoric lamestream media is really too much to bear anymore. Their focus is on "Petraeus's girlfriend" when the real story is #Benghazi
— Joe the Dissident (@joethepatriotic) November 11, 2012
Is the media's obsession with Petraeus hypocritial (Clinton) or a way to avoid talking about Benghazi?
— Mick Coyle (@mickcoyle) November 11, 2012
https://twitter.com/JKRiashiJr/status/267388831358136322
https://twitter.com/TeaPartyBoise/status/267678110906994688
What if Petraeus fessed up to this old affair and resigned in order to try to make the lame stream media report on #BENGHAZI?
— RoseThistleArtworks (@rosethistleart) November 11, 2012
There are no Bob Woodwards in media today to blow whistle on Benghazi & Petraeus cover-ups.#Maureen Dowd & #Laura Ingram only 1s w cogliones
— Noyb (@BORNCURIOUS) November 11, 2012
I can't wait till the mainstream news media shows us a "time line of Petraeus's affair" while not wandering about the time line of #Benghazi
— deepereyes (@deepereyes) November 10, 2012
https://twitter.com/Tango_06/status/267606303956930560
What’s the difference between Benghazi and the Petraeus sex scandal? One heavily damaged a reputation, and the other left four Americans dead.
Join the Conversation
VIP members get the ability to comment on articles.