'How Is This Real?' Scott Pelley's Post-Firing Instagram Pic Sparks More Than a...
Report: Sen. Chris Murphy Funding Group Behind Anti-ICE Riots
The Economist Looks at the 'New' Dangerous Rhetoric About Anti-White Prejudice in British...
Border Czar Tom Homan Explains What Happens If Delaney Hall in Newark Is...
New Republic: The Firing of Scott Pelley Will 'Reverberate in American Journalism History'
WaPo: Pete Hegseth Takes Six of His Kids Along on Official Visit to...
Woman: Kiddo Came Home Crying After Being Told in Sex Ed That Only...
Obama Bro Says JB Pritzker Should Strip Family of Bears Ownership and Give...
Dem Rep. Debbie Dingell Decides a Profanity-Laced Shaming Is the Best Way to...
Here's a Platner Campaign Update That's 'Everything You Need to Know About the...
Lefty Thug Trying to Block Vehicles at ICE Detention Center Gets Introduced to...
Border Security Funded, Family Values Defended: Conservatives Deliver on Capitol Hill
Ex Biden-Harris Staffer Explains Why Hypocrisy Is Running Rampant (THIS Deflection Sounds...
Ratio-Palooza! JB Pritzker's Statement on Chicago Bears' Likely Move to Indiana Gets Torch...
Bill Maher Torpedoed and Sank Dem Sen. Chris Murphy's BS Spin About 60...

BAM! Vox just BUSTED lib narrative that voter ID laws hurt minorities and turnout

Well, this isn’t going according to the Dem playbook, is it?

Advertisement

From Vox:

It was supposed to be the study that proved voter ID laws are not just discriminatory but can also have a big impact on elections. And it was picked up widely, with outlets including ThinkProgress and the Washington Post reporting that the study found voter ID laws hurt Hispanic voters in particular and skewed elections to the right.

But a follow-up study suggests the findings in the original were bunk. According to researchers at Stanford, Yale, and the University of Pennsylvania, the original study was based on surveys of voters that are extremely unreliable — skewing the results. On top of that, several calculation errors led to even more problems. When the errors are corrected, the follow-up researchers found, there’s no evidence in the analyzed data that voter ID laws have a statistically significant impact on voter turnout.

Another gem from Vox — increased early voting might actually decrease turnout:

In fact, none of the other voting restrictions enacted by states seem to have much of an effect on voting either. Researchers have found, for example, mixed effects on whether early voting increases turnout, with one recent study finding that it actually decreased turnout on net if voters couldn’t register to vote and cast their ballot on the same day.

So, when do Republicans get their apology?

Advertisement

And when will Dems change their rhetoric? For example, teachers union head Randi Weingarten posted the now-debunked data as fact:

As did the SPLC:

And on and on and on:

***

 

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement