NBC News: Queer the Ballet Is Trying to Fix National Crisis of Scarcity...
Reid Wiseman Moved to Tears At Sight of the Cross
Newsweek: Student Self-Deports After Enduring ‘Inhumane’ ICE Conditions
Mayor Brandon Johnson Talks Reparations, Says Restaurant Industry Has Vestiges in Slavery
The Other Shoe Drops: Anna Paulina Luna Reports Sexual Misconduct Allegations Against Rube...
Once Fine Blokes, Now Just Broke: UK Would Be the Poorest State in...
Pope Leo: "Woe to Those Who Manipulate Religion … For Their Own Military...
Judge Again Blocks Construction of White House Ballroom, Says Bunker Can Proceed
Whoopi Goldberg Schools People Who Think They Know the Bible-Bible
Trump Calls Out Pope’s Selective Silence: 'Tell That to the Pope' on Iran...
Variety: Pete Hegseth Tried to Evoke Scripture but Quoted ‘Pulp Fiction’ Instead
Hennepin County Attorney Issues Nationwide Arrest Warrant for ICE Agent for Assault
People Can't Help but Notice Where Kamala Harris Did NOT Record Her 'Gas...
HRM: Deadbeat Jerks at The Lincoln Project Have Some 'Splainin' to Do About...
Antisemites UNITE! Ilhan Omar Praises Candace Owens and I'd Only Be More Surprised...

BAM! Vox just BUSTED lib narrative that voter ID laws hurt minorities and turnout

Well, this isn’t going according to the Dem playbook, is it?

Advertisement

From Vox:

It was supposed to be the study that proved voter ID laws are not just discriminatory but can also have a big impact on elections. And it was picked up widely, with outlets including ThinkProgress and the Washington Post reporting that the study found voter ID laws hurt Hispanic voters in particular and skewed elections to the right.

But a follow-up study suggests the findings in the original were bunk. According to researchers at Stanford, Yale, and the University of Pennsylvania, the original study was based on surveys of voters that are extremely unreliable — skewing the results. On top of that, several calculation errors led to even more problems. When the errors are corrected, the follow-up researchers found, there’s no evidence in the analyzed data that voter ID laws have a statistically significant impact on voter turnout.

Another gem from Vox — increased early voting might actually decrease turnout:

In fact, none of the other voting restrictions enacted by states seem to have much of an effect on voting either. Researchers have found, for example, mixed effects on whether early voting increases turnout, with one recent study finding that it actually decreased turnout on net if voters couldn’t register to vote and cast their ballot on the same day.

So, when do Republicans get their apology?

Advertisement

And when will Dems change their rhetoric? For example, teachers union head Randi Weingarten posted the now-debunked data as fact:

As did the SPLC:

And on and on and on:

***

 

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement