Kamala and Kentaji: Former Dem VP Harris Says Supreme Court Justice Jackson’s Dissents...
Katie Couric Tells Jennifer Welch That Progressive ‘News’ Outlets Are Trying to Adhere...
Rosie O'Donnell Goes on Three Day Trump Blackout - Can She Make It?
Congressional Candidate: Don't Worry About School Sickness Because Man With Brain Worm Is...
Minnesota Judges Form Rock Band Despite Increase in Threats to Blow Off Steam
NEA Says We Should Refer to America as 'What We Now Call the...
OOF! The Body Language of Fani Willis's Lawyer Says EVERYTHING About Her
Priest Twists Gospels to Critique Travel Ban and Immigration Policy
Boston Globe Covers the 'ICE Tea Party' in Rebellion Against Trump's Immigration Policy
AG Keith Ellison Announces Settlement With Kia and Hyundai Over Car Thefts
Dan Bongino Leaving the FBI in January
WHAT Insider Trading? Time Lapse Graph of Nancy Pelosi's AMAZING Stock Trading Acumen...
Miles ‘Anonymous’ Taylor Putting Up Billboards That Would Make the Seditious Six Proud
Sen. Ed Markey Says Trump’s Travel Ban Is ‘Racism Disguised as Security’
Nearly $150,000 Raised for Elderly Employee Harassed at Target for Wearing a Charlie...

BAM! Vox just BUSTED lib narrative that voter ID laws hurt minorities and turnout

Well, this isn’t going according to the Dem playbook, is it?

Advertisement

From Vox:

It was supposed to be the study that proved voter ID laws are not just discriminatory but can also have a big impact on elections. And it was picked up widely, with outlets including ThinkProgress and the Washington Post reporting that the study found voter ID laws hurt Hispanic voters in particular and skewed elections to the right.

But a follow-up study suggests the findings in the original were bunk. According to researchers at Stanford, Yale, and the University of Pennsylvania, the original study was based on surveys of voters that are extremely unreliable — skewing the results. On top of that, several calculation errors led to even more problems. When the errors are corrected, the follow-up researchers found, there’s no evidence in the analyzed data that voter ID laws have a statistically significant impact on voter turnout.

Another gem from Vox — increased early voting might actually decrease turnout:

In fact, none of the other voting restrictions enacted by states seem to have much of an effect on voting either. Researchers have found, for example, mixed effects on whether early voting increases turnout, with one recent study finding that it actually decreased turnout on net if voters couldn’t register to vote and cast their ballot on the same day.

So, when do Republicans get their apology?

Advertisement

And when will Dems change their rhetoric? For example, teachers union head Randi Weingarten posted the now-debunked data as fact:

As did the SPLC:

And on and on and on:

***

 

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement