Message on Jack Smith's Shirt at 'Power to the People' Concert Confirms Partisan...
Pucker Up: Amy Klobuchar Disrespects the American Flag While Kissing Up to Somalis...
Tom Homan Breaking Out Puppets and Crayons to Explain Immigration Law to CBS...
Retired Army Medic LEVELS Ro Khanna and His Partisan War-Blame Checklist in 1...
Polls Bear Little Positives for GOP
Sen. Chris Murphy Thought Visiting the Middle East Made Him Look BRAVE. He...
Jessica Tarlov Claims Mamdani Is Actually 'Pretty Cool' for Not Ushering in Sharia...
RUH-RO! Ro Khanna Reaps a Ratio TSUNAMI on Post Blaming Republicans for America's...
That One Time John Fetterman Made Donna Brazile Look STUPID on Bill Maher...
People Are LOVING How BADLY Western Lensman EMBARRASSED Amy Klobuchar With Old Biden...
Xavier Becerra Has Some SERIOUS ’Splainin’ to Do About That $12 Sob Story...
Bro, Take the L! James Talarico's OFFICIAL Campaign Account BUSTED Lying About Rally...
MI’s Jewish AG Supports Abdul El-Sayed Because He’ll Better Protect Separation of Church...
Socialist Asks What You Want Your Tax Dollars Going to If Not Food...
Lunatic Tries to Run Down Maine Wire Reporter for 'Invasion of Privacy': Suspect...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement