Gavin Newsom Gets TORCHED for Playing Victim After Ted Cruz's Jab ('Victimhood Self-Own'...
DEVELOPING: Robert Dorgan a.k.a. ‘Roberta Esposito’ Shoots Six at a Youth Hockey Game...
Equator Locator? AOC Stuns Munich Crowd With Her Geographical ‘Knowledge’ of South America
Rolling Stone: American Girl Doll ‘Influencers’ Protest ICE, Show About Domestic Terrorism...
Dem Hakeem Jeffries Has Mini-Meltdown When Pushed by Wajahat Ali to Commit to...
Panicking Padilla: Dem Says the SAVE Act Will Make America Just Like Nazi...
Irish Illegal’s Abandoned Daughters Say He Should Return Home to Face Drug Charges
Hypocritical Lefties Demand English ONLY in Their Own 'Sanctuary' ICE Warning Group Chat
Gavin Newsom's BS About Calif. vs. Tenn. Gets NUKED by Marsha Blackburn and...
Balenciaga 2.0? Frida Baby Slammed for 'Disgusting' Sexual Jokes on Infant Products –...
Sassy ICE King Reads Entitled AWFL Karen for Filth, Leaves Her Gagged and...
NBC News: A Half-Dozen Top Administration Officials Appear in the Epstein Files
Touched a Nerve: Gov. Wes Moore Says The Free Beacon Can Ask the...
Trump Announces Federal Takeover After Maryland Fails to Address Massive Sewage Leak
No Kings? Tell That to Judge Playing Orwell's Ministry of Truth: Orders Trump...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement