Sports Illustrated Changes Its Headline About Sophie Cunningham and ‘Karma’ After Backlash
Joe Scarborough Snaps on 'Morning Joe' Over Democrat Socialists
Cheese Wheel of Fortune: Italian Parmesan Banks Face Economic Meltdown Due to Extreme...
Fauci’s Secret Texts: 'Shot Might Cause Miscarriages'… yet Told Pregnant Women It Was...
Greasy Gavin Newsom Comes Up With a New Label for Himself to Try...
We Don't DO THAT Here! Justine Bateman DOG-WALKS Abdul El-Sayed and ALL Sharia...
Bro, REALLY? Adam Schiff Set Himself Up for EPIC Self-Own That STILL Has...
Katie Pavlich Takes Hasan Piker APART Quote-By-Quote and WOOF, He's Even NASTIER Than...
Zohran Mamdani Will HATE This Newly Surfaced Video of Him BRAGGING About Fooling...
DISGUSTING: Jillian Michaels Tears Rolling Stone a NEW ONE for Fanboying Over Antisemite...
J.K. Rowling's COMPLETE Dismantling of Antisemite Is One for the Books (Pun Intended)
She MAD: CA Lawyer SUPER Defensive Over $15 Beef Pic 'Proving' Home Cooking...
Just WOW: Democrat Dark Money Harasses Own MT Nominee’s Family to Force Her...
Abdul El-Sayed Endorses Ilhan Omar and Her Behavior in the Video He Posted...
The Memes, Oh the GLORIOUS Memes! Obama Bros Interview Chris Hayes but All...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement