'Screeching Like a Hyena': Randi Weingarten’s Viral Rant Proves Why Teachers’ Unions Are...
Jim Acosta Nods Along When Lefties Say Trump Stole an Election but Calls...
Trump Calls Out China’s 2020 Election Interference — DeSantis Drops Hammer: Yank All...
Mark Kelly Trips Over Fellow Democrats in Rush to Slam Trump for Election...
Maine Dem 'Ashley': Puts AI Fantasy Waifu As His Real Book Author Pic...
It Gets REAL: Post Details What Can Happen Now That Trump Has Declassified...
CBS News Rates Election Info Trump Declassified As 'False' Without Looking at the...
Release the Clown Car! Maine Dems Host a Forum to Replace Disgraced Graham...
Herridge BOMBSHELLS: Intel Officials ‘Massaged’ Briefings to Hide China’s 2020 Election In...
German World Cup Tourist Freddy Hits the Gun Range, Learns About Freedom (and...
Rob Schneider Declares Islamophobia Doesn’t Exist in Response to Proposed VA Legislation
Rep Says There Are So Many Homophobes in This Admin With 'Weird, Like,...
CNN's Brian Stelter Says CBS Is 'Prebunking' President Trump's Address
NBC News: Young Dad Working to Give His Daughter a Stable Life Killed...
Masked Woman at Mamdani Housing Event Declares That Eviction Equals Violence

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos