Ben Shapiro Can't Help but Notice All the WORST PEOPLE Seem to Agree...
Trump TORCHES ABC's 'Shaky Anchor' David Muir for FAKE Reflecting Pool Story and...
For Your Consideration: Seth Moulton Submits His Oscar Reel of Fake Outrage Over...
MS NOW’s Nicolle Wallace Tells ‘Independent’ Podcaster Jim Acosta WH Briefings Under Trump...
South Carolina Governor Appoints Lindsey Graham’s Sister, Darline Graham, to His Senate Se...
Ben Crump, Al Sharpton Get Involved as Protesters Demand Answers in Death of...
Keith Ellison: Trump’s Attacks on Somali Kindergartners Are Disgusting
Photo From ICE-Involved Shooting in Maine Shows Bullet Holes in Car's Windshield
Crazy Candace Conspiracy Comedically Crushed
Nearly 300,000 People Comment on Rule That Would Strip Grant Funding Power Away...
James Talarico Says ‘Fellow Texan’ Who Tried to Run Down ICE Agent Deserves...
Fed-Up 'Trump Supporter' Asks Congressman If There's Any Line in the Sand Where...
Mayor Zohran Mamdani Pleased to Announce New York's Fashionable New Sidewalk Sheds
HIDE THE WOMEN! Zohran Mamdani's Explanation of Why R*pe Is Rising In New...
Toronto Police in ‘Trans SUV’ Post Video of Harassment by Pickup Truck Driver

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement