The View Panelists Quickly Became James Comey's Lawyers When Alina Habba Said the...
Cluck Around and Find Out: Why Rotisserie Chicken on SNAP Went Full Slippery...
Supreme Court: No More Racial Gerrymandering; Mehdi Hasan: Time to Rig the Court...
Tim Walz Tried to Save His Career But Kash Patel Made Him Regret...
'No Radical Footprint': NPR Dismisses WHCD Shooter’s Manifesto Because It Read Like MSNBC...
Scott Jennings Exposes the $200 BILLION Scam Machine Targeting Your Parents
Florida House Overwhelmingly Passed DeSantis' New Congressional Maps and the Dems Did NOT...
Rosa DeLauro Said the Most Anti-Science Thing Ever to Lee Zeldin During Purple...
Left: 'Trump Must Lower the Temperature!' Wajahat Ali: Literally Begs Trump to Die...
Ex DOJ Official Tells CNN the Comey Indictment Is the Worst Case Ever...
Fraud Alert: Mallory McMorrow Deletes Thousands of Tweets Trashing Michigan While Running...
Dorkiest Assassin EVER: WHCD Shooter Takes Cringe Mirror Selfie, Gears Up Like John...
Chris Cillizza Says Trump Wants to Make James Comey's Life Miserable for As...
Instead of Addressing Sasse’s Call to Value Kids Over Dopamine, American Humanist Editor...
Heartstrings Over Hard Facts: NBC Turns Illegal Congolese Migrants (Denied Asylum Twice) I...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement