A New Dope: Obama and Mark Hamill Ruin ‘Star Wars Day’ With Cringy...
WaPo Marks Day 4 of Leftist Hero Protesting Iran, AI From Top of...
NYT: Children of GOP Parents Intimidate Kids by Showing Up at School With...
DataRepublican Looks at Death Threats on Miles Taylor’s Leaky UndoTrump Website
TMZ: ICE Agents Drag Man Out of Hospital as a Mob of Livid...
Chicago Alderman Wants Walgreens Charged With 'Corporate Abandonment' for Closing Store
The Left Demanded Police Bodycams and Got 'em -- Possibly the Greatest Backfire...
Katie Porter, Fresh Off the Ozempic Fidget Fest, Says Trump Ruins Everything
60 Minutes: White Supremacists Act as 'Disaster Tourists' to Aid in Recruiting and...
Press Moved Indoors After Shooting Incident Near White House; Secret Service Respond
Liz 'Spirit Killer' Warren Strikes Again: Attacks Bezos for Met Gala While Peddling...
Connecticut AG Says ‘We Are Sovereign in This State’ in Attempt to Force...
Leftist Judge to Trump Assassination Suspect: 'My Deepest Apologies for the Suicide Watch,...
The Hill: Poll Shows Most Americans Say Trump Is Mentally and Physically Unfit...
MI Dem Chairwoman Honors Nazi Grandpa on Veterans Day — Then Threatens to...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement