Elizabeth Warren Puts Her Flawless Political Instincts Back to Work With MI Senate...
They Never, EVER Thought Trump Would Win: Obama Got REALLY Lazy, Ask Us...
The Merch Tent at a Sanders/AOC Rally in My State Was Bernie-Style Anti-Capitalism...
Former Obama Bro Proves There IS Such a Thing As a STUPID Question...
Zohran Mamdani's Attempt to Take Credit for World Cup Tournament Success Hit a...
Monday Morning Meme Madness
High-Water Marx? Scott Jennings Pushes Back on Progressive Corbin Trent Who Says Socialism...
Blow-By-Blow: Harry Sisson and Don Lemon Want to Go One-On-One With Male Members...
Crass Media: Minnesota Star Tribune Columnist Cheers Tim Walz for Pardoning Illegal Alien...
Accent Precedent: It Turns Out That AOC's Duplicitous Dialects Are a Die-Hard Democrat...
Celebrate! Vice President JD Vance and Second Lady Usha Welcome Baby Boy
El-Sayed’s Revealing Dodge: Tapper Presses Him on Ayatollah, He Cites Mourning in Michigan
Gone Too Soon, and Not Soon Enough to Fix It
Van Jones Thanked for Un-Defining Progressivism
NYT Left Baffled by the Radical Concept of a Married, Pregnant Working Mom...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement