Jake Tapper, Thomas Massie Play 'Fun Police' With White House Deputy Chief of...
Five Terror Suspects Arrested Near UK Air Force Base Sunday Released on Bail;...
Cryptic Campaign: Don’t Say ‘Cheese!’ — The Laughing Cow’s Logo Switch Is Nothing...
Boston Mayor Invites Illegal Immigrants to Apply for $575 Scholarship to Learn to...
There's Been a THIRD Arrest but ABC News STILL Doesn't Want to Ruin...
AOC's Political Future Crumbling? Democrats Warn Her To ‘Stay Away'
Here's a Flashback Reminder Ahead of the Midterms of the Ease With Which...
COVID Fraud Chris Cuomo Says Scott Jennings ‘Has a Lot to Answer for...
Todd Blanche Caught ABC's Martha Raddatz Pushing More BS, So She Wanted to...
Senate Dems Skipped a Hearing on Protecting Women's Sports, So Guess Who Else...
DHS Has 4 Words (and 1 GIF) for 'Migrant Caravan' Reportedly Headed Toward...
Monday Morning Meme Madness
Americans Are Moving to Poland for Safety, but They’re Celebrating Policies They Won’t...
Jameis Winston Turns His Infamous Publix Crab Leg Moment Into Pure Comedy Gold
Sen. Jim Banks Makes Case for Space Force in Indiana

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement