The White House Getting Security Upgrades Is All the TDS Crowd Needs to...
Jake Tapper Slathers Himself In Shame by Entertaining Rosie O'Donnell's Frothy-Mouthed Mad...
Graham Platner's Withdrawal Statement Is as Dignified as He Always Was (i.e., NOT...
‘Minnesota Man’: Guardian US Headline About Illegal Alien Child Rapist Is a Combo...
Skin Grifting: Texas Democrat Jolanda Jones Says James Talarico Needs to Pay Blacks...
Radial Ratio: Texas Dem’s Tired Idea of ICE Agent Self-Defense Against Moving Vehicles...
Marco Rubio Blocks Tim Walz's Illegal Pardon, Newsom Froze Like Deer In Headlights
Sayonara, Sex Offender: Marco Rubio Reminds Tim Walz What Protecting Americans Looks Like
Orca Orchestrations: Hollywood’s ‘Reimagining’ of ‘Free Willy’ Has Movie Fans Wailing with...
Scott Jennings Just Needs 1 Post to Shut Conspiracy Nuts Attacking America/Israel's Allian...
Hakeem Jeffries Is Getting Help Deciphering What His Opposition to the SAVE Act...
Gavin Newsom Is a Lying Sack of SNOT. In Other News, Water Is...
She's Gonna BLOW! Ana Navarro Completely UNRAVELS When Asked to Name 1 American...
Rep. Ilhan Omar Was Eager to Answer Questions About Huge Financial Disclosure Revisions...
Oh, HONEY: X Points and LAUGHS As Maine Dems Pretend They're SUPER DUPER...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos