Scott Jennings: Fatal Minneapolis ICE Shooting Is the Result of a Year of...
ICE Shooting: Elissa Slotkin Polices Trump’s Words While Tim Walz Talks War With...
Dem Dan Goldman Adds Fuel to Flames by Labeling Minnesota ICE Shooting ‘Outright...
New York Times Dubs Mamdani Appointee Cea Weaver a ‘Firebrand’
Rep. Nancy Mace: Oversight Committee Tables Motion to Subpoena Rep. Ilhan Omar's Immigrati...
Rep. Ted Lieu Reminds Servicemen Not to Obey Unlawful Orders and Invade Greenland
'Certainly Stronger'? GOP Rep. Gill Obliterates Witness Claiming Somalis Are 'Strengthenin...
Rep. at Hearing on MN Fraud Says More Time Should Be Spent on...
Insurrection: Anti-ICE Rioters Break Glass at Federal Courthouse in Minneapolis
Social Media Stunt Gone Fatal ... Wife Captures Entire Scene As Partner Tries...
Flashback: Here's MN Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan Telling Citizens to Put Their Bodies...
ShipWreckedCrew Challenges Lefty Author's 'Proof' the Driver Had No Intention to Run Over...
CBS Staffers ‘Aghast’ at ‘Both-Sides Mess’ of Jan. 6 Report Brian Stelter Calls...
Greenland Belongs With America: Strategic Imperative, Mineral Riches, and Ending Danish At...
Nancy Pelosi Skips Some Details to Express Outrage Over the ICE Shooting in...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos