Berlin Pride Attack: Known Islamist Abdul Ballout Killed by Police After Leaving 1...
Just Released: While USA Buried Its Dead, Fauci’s COVID Diary Celebrated His ‘Explosive’...
Bombshell on Fox News: Deranged DSA Leader Drops Mask — 'Yes, We Want...
Two GOP Senators Urge No Recess
GOOD! Families of 9/11 Victims Want Mayor Zohran Mamdani BANNED From 25th Anniversary
Dem Sen. Chris Van Hollen Assures Michigan Voters That El-Sayed Will Protect Criminal...
Hakeem Jeffries Reaches Stage Two of Democrat Denial Regarding New Jersey Election Fraud
'You're Late to the MAGA Party!' Dems AGAIN Try to Rip Off (and...
Maximum Overdrive: NBC News Once Again Reports About the Violent Rage of Self-Driving...
People Mag Slams Trump's Transphobic Joke About Kaitlan Collins (and Everyone Has the...
Journo Tells Rupert Lowe a Lot of People Could Interpret 'Anglo-Saxon' as White...
Convicted Murderer Karmelo Anthony Seeks a New Trial, Claims Judge Was Biased
Judges Enter Orders Preventing DHS From Terminating TPS for Ethiopia, South Sudan
Landlords Ban Work-from-Home Tenants: Because Using the Place You Rent Is Apparently Too...
NYT's Maggie Haberman Reports Trump Has Massively Escalated Against the Smithsonian

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement