Kamala Harris Makes Articulate, Coherent Post on Dems' Call to Slow AI Raises...
Mehdi Hasan Marvels at Childlike Ignorance of Brett Kavanaugh Explaining Why 9/11 Happened
Federal Judge Refers Leftist Philly DA to DOJ for Criminal Investigation
Judge Blocks the Kennedy Center Board From Putting Trump's Name on the Building...
How NYC’s First Couple Hides Devout Islamism Behind Western Clothes and Drag-Show Vibes
Rep. Thomas Massie Moves to Impeach Pete Hegseth for High Crimes and Misdemeanors
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Busts Out ‘The Robot’ in TikTok Rooftop Dance
Famous Last Words He Yelled on Camera: ‘I’m Not Going Back to Haiti.’...
NY Regents Scrap Graduation Exam Requirement: ‘You Don’t Assess a Fish on Climbing...
Sheriff Calls Lame-Duck Dan Goldman a ‘Degenerate’ for Smearing Him in Front of...
Bernie Sanders: Today's AI Is the 'Dumbest Version.' Replies: 'Mirror's Right There, Bro'
Haley Stevens Lost the Senate Primary. Then She Became Michigan’s Most Charming Also-Ran
Journalism: Jim Acosta Reminds Us That Trump Votes by Mail
Athletic Columnist Explains Why Sydney Sweeney's Ad Triggers Her PTSD From a 12-Year-Old...
The Holdout the Left Can’t Cancel: Haitian Immigrant Refused to Acquit Clancy —...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement