Transphobic ‘Comedian’ Tells NBA Stars to Chemically Transition or STFU
Scott Jennings Hilariously DROPS Abdul El-Sayed and His 'Football Challenge' With a Single...
MI AG Charges Noncitizens for Doing What the State's SOS Assured Everybody Could...
Marco’s Montage: White House Gifts Rubio a Framed Collage of His Popular ‘Realizing’...
We Just Figured Out Abdul Sucks, We Just Figured Out Abdul Sucks ......
Tim Miller Is VERY Concerned About Our Clean, Crime-Free 'Dystopian' Nation's Capital
Ben Shapiro Calmly SCHOOLING an Unhinged Tucker Carlson and His 'Demoralization Agents' Is...
Talarico Deploys Baptist Preacher 'Paw-Paw' to Soften Radical Stance on God, Gender, and...
Anna Paulina Luna Shares 'the Democrat Playbook' in a Short 3-Part Corruption Story
OOF, the L's Just Keep Adding UP! Abigail Spanberger Served Up yet Another...
'Opps' Just Replay His Words: Hasan Piker Eyes Suing Scott Jennings for Exposing...
Matt Gaetz Comes Unglued Over Israel in SAVAGE Back and Forth With The...
Settle DOWN, Tiny: Abdul El-Sayed Challenging Mike Rogers to a Football Game Goes...
Let's Check in With How Decades of Climate Change Doom and Gloom Have...
Heap-Big OUCH! Peggy Flanagan Throws Elizabeth Warren Under the TEEPEE in Fundraising Emai...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement