Dem Senator Whitehouse Bankrolling Platner Tells His Victims to Get Over It —...
Matt Stoller Ditches 'HR Lady' Politics for Nazi-Tattooed, Sexting, Girlfriend-Roughing, R...
With the Bidens Determined to Stay in the Spotlight This Year, CNN Has...
Marco Rubio Faced Down a Democrat Firing Squad and Walked out Without a...
Jimmy Kimmel Melts Down Over Spencer Pratt’s Strong LA Mayor Run: ‘We Should...
Worst. Take. EVER --> Sure, Graham Platner Assaulted That Conservative Woman BUUUT ...
When Do We Get an Update From MS NOW's Morning Joe About the...
Hakeem Jeffries Gets Reality Nuked After Being Triggered by Trump's Plan to 'Ruin'...
That One Time the Republican Nominee for Governor of Iowa Schooled Obama TO...
Well, Well, WELL... What Do We Have HERE?! Even NBC Notices Late Ballot...
Believe ALL Women? Krystal Ball Smears Graham Planter Accuser and Trips SPECTACULARLY Over...
Newsom's Jab at Trump's Reflecting Pool Project Aged Predictably (but I Understand His...
A-HOLE Who Publicized Aborting His Unborn Child With Down Syndrome NOW Playing the...
YUP, Looks Like the NYT Set Lyndsey Fifield Up As a Gift to...
There's Obviously Been a Rule Change Since These Dems Said This About the...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement