Democratic Socialist Hypocrisy Exposed Yet Again
Honduran National Registered to Vote in CA Taunted ICE Agent He Was Going...
What the Socialists Get Wrong About the Affordability Problem Is... EVERYTHING
Judge Rules Trump Admin Cannot Deport Noncitizens for Supporting Terrorist Organizations
Transphobe Norman Ornstein Demands WNBA Prospects Take Estrogen and Have Surgery
Snopes Looks Into Whether Dolly Parton’s Imagination Library Donated Books to Israel
Gov. Kathy Hochul’s Press Office: Trump Is Lying About Her Releasing 7,000 Criminal...
Jewish Congressional Candidate Brad Lander Not Exactly Warmly Welcomed at Indian Protest
CBS News: As 9/11 Anniversary Approaches, Abdul El-Sayed May Face Increased Political Atta...
American Heroes of 9/11: Rescue Dogs
InfantryDort Pens Impassioned Plea to Jeff Bezos: 'Give Us a F***ing Chance!'
NUTTIER Than A Squirrel's BM —> Rosie O’Donnell Claims America Is Making Concentration...
Democrat Caught LYING That His Mom Had to 'Fight to Pay Rent and...
BLINK Twice If You Need HELP! Abdul El-Sayed Presser Clip Looks Like a...
Krystal Ball’s SMUG Anti-Trump Data Center Dunk Goes HORRIBLY, HILARIOUSLY Sideways

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement