Scott Jennings Explains the ‘Patriotism Gap’ Between Republicans and Democrats to CNN’s An...
Public Pool in Germany Evacuated After Dozens of French Men Jump the Fence
Man Genuinely Upset That Trump Has Ruined America’s 250th Birthday for Him
Love Above: Daredevil Couple Gets Engaged During Death-Defying Climb of Empire State Build...
Darializa 'Abolish the Police' Avila Chevalier Wants to Turn the US Into a...
Jordanian Immigrant Gets One Year in Jail For Killing a Jewish Man at...
CA Sen. Scott Wiener Votes Down Ban on Registered Sex Offenders Holding Office
Columbus, Buffalo Raise the Somali Flag Over City Hall to Celebrate Somali Independence...
Zohran Mamdani's Air Conditioning Guidance Officially Ushers in NYC's 'Warmth of Collectiv...
Clown Reminds Us 'Anchor Baby' Barron Trump Was Born Four Months Before Melania...
Mother of Plaintiff in Supreme Court Case Says 'She' Just Wanted to Play...
Cooked or Cooking?: JB Pritzker Says DSA Is Dems’ ‘Recipe for Winning’ Future...
Lee Zeldin Has a Chilly Reality Check for French Official Blaming America for...
Twitchy Celebrates America 250
JB Pritzker Makes Himself an Exception to Mamdani and Sanders' 'Billionaires Shouldn't Exi...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement