JB Pritzker Gets SUPER Patriotic and Yeah, I Just Threw Up in My...
Seth Dillon Just HUMILIATES Candace Owens for Accusing Him of Employing Bots With...
Midterm Panic? Try Not to Laugh When Listening to Hakeem Jeffries Say Who...
I Said What I SAID: Sophie Cunningham OWNS Woke Male Journos Asking Her...
Jessica Tarlov Learns the Hard Way SHE'S Disconnected From Reality Claiming Righties Are...
THIS Is the Same CNN That Wouldn't Carry Trump's Address for Fear of...
Candace Owens Gets All High and Mighty With Piers Morgan About Her Degrees...
Dems Have a SERIOUS Scumbag Problem: WI Dem Gov Candidate’s Fake X Account...
Let Them FIGHT! LGBTQ+ WA Peeps PISSED at Dem for Refusing to Support...
Let's Flash Back to NBC News Debunking Trump's Claim That Noncitizens Vote (and...
You'll Never GUESS What Obama OPENLY Told Illegals About Voting in 2016 (Ok,...
These CNN Election Fraud Shots and Chasers Are Suitable for Framing (Shifting Goalposts...
Spin and Grin: Mayor Mamdani Tells Jon Stewart DSA Members Disagree on Abolishing...
MS NOW’s Molly Jong-Fast Mad Trump Is Using Fact Non-Citizens Are Voting to...
Hot Take: We Know About the Noncitizens Voting in NJ *Because* Our Elections...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement