ICE Agents Breach Car Wash Owner’s Rights by Ignoring ‘Employees Only’ Sign
Former '60 Minutes' Correspondent Calls Settlement 'The Nadir for the Network'
Dem Robert Garcia Melts Down Over BBB Supercharging ICE to Deport His Party’s...
Hello, Ratio! Chris Cillizza Gets DRAGGED for Playing the 'Both Sides' Card to...
New Report: John Brennan Rushed the Russian Interference Intelligence Assessment
MORE Winning! SCOTUS Torpedoes ANOTHER Activist Federal Judge's Deportation Ruling
VICTIM BLAMING: Check Out How Germany's Addressing Sexual Harassment at Public Pools This...
SHARP AS A TACK, JACK! Biden Announces New Memoir With Rambling, Incoherent Remarks...
'Manufactured and Contrived:' Dr. Sydney Watson GOES OFF on the Problem With Pedro...
Joe Biden's Autopen Slams BBB Passage With More Lies While X Users Sink...
And CUE the Big BEAUTIFUL Meltdowns: Here Are the Best Tantrums After Trump's...
BIG BEAUTIFUL SALE: Celebrate the OBBB's Passage With 74% Off VIP Memberships!
Flying Flap: Part of Delta Boeing Plane Wing Found In North Carolina Driveway
Big Beautiful Bill Passes Big Beautiful House, Heads to President's Big Beautiful Desk
Our New Spirit Animal! Virginia Foxx's Reaction to Hakeem Jeffries FINALLY Shutting Up...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement