Dear Democrats, If You Don't Like Trump's Narco-Boat Strategy, Take It Up With...
BAD Choice of Words: Eric Swalwell Could NOT Have Chosen a More Hilariously...
Epic Post Goes Straight-Up BIBLICAL Explaining Why the Left 'Always Wins' and What...
Lefty Law Student SCHOOLED in Thread for Using States Like WY to Blame...
The Family That Called Half the Country Nazis Now Shocked People Fight Back
Asylum Denied: Peru Not Celebrating Your Gay Wedding Hard Enough Isn’t Genocide
Museum of Modern Mental Illness Just Acquired Its New Crown Jewel: The Pantone...
Woman Says There Should Be a Law That All Trump Voters Wear a...
NBC News: Survey Says 82% of Trans Employees Suffered Harassment at Work
My Way or the Deportation Highway: Nancy Sinatra Forgets Dad’s Real America
Patty Murray: José Screams in Excruciating Pain As an ICE Vehicle Allegedly Runs...
DOJ Accused of Politicizing Multiple Sex Offender's Case to Harm Somali Community
SNAP Showdown: Dems Cry 'Privacy' While Handing Voter Data to Leftist Orgs—Hypocrisy Alert
BREAKING: WaPo Catches Us Up on What Rosie O’Donnell Has Been Up To
X Fined: President of European Commission Tells of the Importance of 'Pre-Bunking' Speech

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement