Karoline Leavitt Says Dems Have Spent YEARS Inspiring Violence and This Thread Has...
How the First Amendment Protected Christians, Not Secularism
WTAF?! LISTEN to What S.E. Cupp Said About Trump Barely 30 Minutes Before...
Trump Is Refusing to Let Them Forget What They Did
Melania Slammed Kimmel for 'Joke' About Her Being Widowed and Brian Stelter Thinks...
Bro, TAKE THE L! Hakeem Jeffries DROPPED Like a Bad HABIT for Lecturing...
Dem Rep. Vindman Says Attempt to Assassinate the President Means Trump Needs to...
X's Nikita Bier's Response to Taylor Lorenz Crying About Leftist Utopia BlueSky Canceling...
'Enough Is ENOUGH': Melania GOES OFF on Coward Jimmy Kimmel and His Violent...
'Peak Politico'! Republicans Are Pouncing (Sort of) Again After the WHCD Shooting
One LOOK at This Senator's X Timeline and You Can Tell Where WHCD...
RATIO! Scott Jennings and Others Self-Awareness Nuke Tim Walz's Post Condemning Political...
Ben Shapiro DOG-WALKS Hasan Piker in BRUTAL Back and Forth About What an...
Nancy Pelosi's Post About WHCD Shooting Sparks Flashbacks to What She Said About...
Virginia Democrats (Especially Abigail Spanberger!) Would Make King George III Himself SO...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement