Sam Stein Melts Down as FBI Raids Top Virginia Democrat — Suddenly ‘Politicized’...
UH OH! Office of Va. Dem State Senator (and 'Close Ally of Gov....
THUD! Obama Trips Over Ex 'Wingman' While Accusing Trump of Using the DOJ...
Dave Portnoy Bodies Mamdani on Antisemitic Vandalism — Hochul’s Press Office Jumps In...
Exceptions to Open Border Limo Libs' 'Nobody Is Illegal on Stolen Land' Rhetoric...
Trump's UFO Disclosure Just Got Real: Patel Says Files Are Ready – Memes...
Bills to Pay? Four Months Ago vs. Today: Megyn Kelly's Head-Spinning Shift on...
White NYT Employee Fights Back Against Alleged Discrimination — And His Colleagues Launch...
That's the Spirit! Pete Buttigieg Can't Believe Trump's Still Blaming the Previous Admin
Kamala Endorses Bass for 'Fixing' Homelessness — Next Day, Homeless Burn Down LA's...
Biden Fail-Up Factory IMPLODES: His Own Alums Call Cali Gov Hopeful Xavier Becerra...
Katie 'Potato' Porter Says the Quiet Part Out Loud (and Other Crazy Things)...
Scott Jennings Reacts to Indiana’s RINO Redistricting Bloodbath, Dems Psaki and Buttigieg...
'Prattman': Spence Pratt's AI Ad Is the Bomb
Party Animal: Ex-MSNBC Host Joy Reid Calls Black Republican Byron Donalds the GOP’s...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos