Owner of Tiny Variety Store Convicted of Trafficking $7 Million in Food Stamp...
Hot Take: Japanese-American Relations on Twitter Got a Lot Warmer
Townhall's Kurt Schlichter Says Not to Freak Out When We Lose the Birthright...
This Isn’t Asylum — It’s Why We Can’t Let Democrats Win Again
NASA Administrator Shares a Seriously Bada** Photo of the Artemis II Liftoff ('MERICA!)
Strong Voice Against Trumpism Notes Ivanka Trump Wasn’t a Citizen When She Gave...
The Verge Argues That the Artemis Moon Base Project Is 'Legally Dubious'
April Fool's Day Fun: Police Introduce Elite Unit of SAUSAGE Dogs
This Kid Gets It! One ... Ahem ... Outspoken Youngster Tells CNN Exactly...
Anti-ICE Activists on Patrol Approaching Cars and Demanding Badges, IDs, or Warrants
Former City Councilman Sentenced After Investigation Found 71 Voter Names Registered to Hi...
California's First Partner Wants to Hold Tech Leaders Responsible for 'Jordan Peterson-Typ...
Chuck Schumer Found a Way to Inject Anti-Trump Politics Into the Artemis II...
Laura Ingraham Says One Question Alone Indicates How Preposterous Justice KBJ’s Appointmen...
TDS Media Claim Trump Was Made to Feel 'Very Small' With a Bad...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement