Randi Weingarten Launches Website to Steer People Away From Shopping at Target
Gossip Girls: CNN’s Kasie Hunt and NYT‘S Maggie Haberman Aren’t ‘Relatively Close’ to...
Paramount Pushes Back Against Mark Ruffalo Claiming Complicity in Palestinian ‘Genocide’
J.K. Rowling: Caring What’s Between Your Date’s Legs Isn’t Bigotry — It’s Not...
Majority of Democrats Want to Recall Seattle Mayor As Starbucks Proceeds With Move...
Hasan Piker Mocks Charlie Kirk’s Assassination on Stage — Crowd Cheers As He...
US Government Plans to Pay $850 Million of the 'Several Billion' It Owes...
Hypocrite 'Eat the Rich' DSA Leader Caught Lying and Living Off Mom &...
This Murder Stat Sums Up the Insanity of Democrat Pro-Illegal Alien Policies
'Journalism' Trifecta! This Week CNN Set the 'Shameless and Embarrassing Fake News' Bar...
Something's Missing From Abdul El-Sayed's Response to Trump's Reminder About His Top Suppo...
Julie Kelly Spots Telling Info in New DOJ Filing in the Comey '8647'...
Bill Maher Makes Dems and Media Smearing Natalie Harp Look Like the Awful...
VA AG Jay Jones Tells County Sheriff He's Under Investigation for ::Checks Notes::...
Radical Left Rising: Britt Blasts Abortion Extremism, Johnson Warns of Midterm Stakes

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement