Ron DeSantis Ends Pennsylvania’s Recruitment Attempt: ‘Florida Has More Wawa Stores’
NYT Tries Sympathy for Illegal Who Sneaked Back In to Birth ‘Anchor Baby’...
Ilhan Omar’s Phony ‘War Survivor’ Act Exposed: She Wasn’t a Victim — Her...
Christine Amanpour Claims She’s the Same Military Rank as Pete Hegseth: 'My Dog...
LIES! Ayanna Pressley: Deporting Haitians Will Collapse U.S. Healthcare Because They’re 1...
The Drunk Republican (and Others) Troll the UK MERCILESSLY After They Found Out...
'Isn't Communism Awesome?' 'New Study' About Mamdani's City-Owned Grocery Stores Will Only...
Zero Self-Awareness Detected: KBJ Says Fellow SCOTUS Justices Are 'Utterly Irrational'
Pattern of Ignorance: Dem Hakeem Jeffries Dodges 'Years of Rumors' Question About Eric...
Wait, Eric Swalwell Reportedly Spent HOW MUCH Donor Money on Hotels?
Trump Wins: Iran Agrees to 'Everything' As Strait of Hormuz Opened 'Forever'
Crockett and Dockets: Jilted Jasmine Shares Career Plans After Losing House Seat and...
Chuck Schumer's Attempt to Mock Trump's Authenticity Gets Roasted Into a Fully Cooked...
Journo Who Admits Burying Swalwell Info Now Blames Fox for Not Covering It—Even...
Spineless in New York: Rep. Lawler Sides With 'The Squad' to Protect Haitian...

If the Second Amendment only applies to muskets ... tired narrative goes BOOM

Each time gun-grabbing is the Leftist movement of the moment, the same false narratives resurface. A popular epiphany among Democrats is the forefathers never envisioned modern-day arms when they wrote the Second Amendment. It is touted with a knowing air of superiority each and every time.

Advertisement

As though persons supporting the Second Amendment have no knowledge of its history or intent. Every manner of careful explanation and historical perspective has been shared with the anti-2A crowd, but they persist with condescending ‘gotcha’ points that are laughably inaccurate.

They really think they are onto something with this.

Other comparisons have been drawn, repeatedly, in an effort to demonstrate how unlikely it is that modernization changes the intent of carefully crafted Constitutional rights.

Not only can we debate the awareness of the potential development of more sophisticated weapons. There are gaping loopholes in the logic regarding the capabilities of certain arms that existed well before 1791.

Advertisement

Yes, cannons were around well before the notion of a Constitutional amendment that guaranteed citizens the right to bear arms.

There is nothing in the 2nd Amendment that expressly forbids specific weapons of choice.

https://twitter.com/VERBAL_CHANCLA/status/1536107483973816320?s=20&t=GtJ17vX7SjKTnVoeCKvx0A

Does the Left really want to give ideas to our arms-bearing friends who would be prepared to organize and defend themselves against tyranny as needed?

There are weapons that could potentially be more alarming than the modern AR-15.

While the plotting, pouncing, and mockery is fun, the angle was addressed in a 2016 US Supreme Court decision.

Everything is up for interpretation in the political arena though, so SCOTUS rulings aside, it wouldn’t hurt to cannon up folks!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos