Jim Acosta Likens Trump’s Name Coming Off the Kennedy Center to the Historic...
The Name of Defame: CNN’s Abby Phillip Defends Bakari Sellers Calling Musk a...
‘I’ll Rip Your Teeth Out’: Muslim ‘Civil Enforcement Officers’ Fired After Threatening Bri...
Law Prof Says Karmelo Anthony Is Entitled to a New Trial Because It...
Libs Lose Their Minds Over UFC & Motocross at the WH — Yet...
Hot New Trend: Posting Photos of Yourself Urinating on Austin Metcalf’s Gravestone
It’s ’Gut-Wrenching’ That Thugs Who Broke Police Officer’s Back in Pro-Hamas 'Protest' Are...
Progressive 'Christian' Author Anne Lamott Uses Her 'Last Favor' With God to Beg...
MeidasTouch: Pilot Filed Safety Reports After Being Blinded by Lights From Trump's UFC...
City Council Meeting in Michigan Doesn't Look Like America, Says End Wokeness
AZ Journo Craig Harris Exposed: Coordinating with Teachers Union While Sending His Kids...
TMZ: Austin Metcalf’s Father Attacks Karmelo Anthony’s Parents as Grifters
NYT: With the US Under a Microscope for Hosting the World Cup, 'They're...
Charlie Kirk's Sister: Leftists' Ghoulish New 'Gotcha' After His Assassination
Couch Potato Aaron Rupar Mocks Pete Hegseth's 'Seizure-Like' Workout by Deceivingly Cuttin...

If the Second Amendment only applies to muskets ... tired narrative goes BOOM

Each time gun-grabbing is the Leftist movement of the moment, the same false narratives resurface. A popular epiphany among Democrats is the forefathers never envisioned modern-day arms when they wrote the Second Amendment. It is touted with a knowing air of superiority each and every time.

Advertisement

As though persons supporting the Second Amendment have no knowledge of its history or intent. Every manner of careful explanation and historical perspective has been shared with the anti-2A crowd, but they persist with condescending ‘gotcha’ points that are laughably inaccurate.

They really think they are onto something with this.

Other comparisons have been drawn, repeatedly, in an effort to demonstrate how unlikely it is that modernization changes the intent of carefully crafted Constitutional rights.

Not only can we debate the awareness of the potential development of more sophisticated weapons. There are gaping loopholes in the logic regarding the capabilities of certain arms that existed well before 1791.

Advertisement

Yes, cannons were around well before the notion of a Constitutional amendment that guaranteed citizens the right to bear arms.

There is nothing in the 2nd Amendment that expressly forbids specific weapons of choice.

https://twitter.com/VERBAL_CHANCLA/status/1536107483973816320?s=20&t=GtJ17vX7SjKTnVoeCKvx0A

Does the Left really want to give ideas to our arms-bearing friends who would be prepared to organize and defend themselves against tyranny as needed?

There are weapons that could potentially be more alarming than the modern AR-15.

While the plotting, pouncing, and mockery is fun, the angle was addressed in a 2016 US Supreme Court decision.

Everything is up for interpretation in the political arena though, so SCOTUS rulings aside, it wouldn’t hurt to cannon up folks!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement