Gavin Newsom Rake Stomps Again While Pointing Out How Much Gas Prices Have...
This Is BIG! Abdul El-Sayed Just Lost a BIG Endorsement (Especially in Michigan!)...
Hasan Piker Goes Rogue, Screws Democrats With America 'Worse' Than Al-Qaeda Comment
The New York Times Just Reminded Us All How Much They Suck With...
Sue McDonnell Continues to SPIRAL, Starts Actively Challenging X to PROVE She Doxxed...
Haley Stevens Holds Her Own Against UNHINGED El-Sayed Fan Threatening Her With the...
'Fear,' 'Terrifying': How Americans Really Feel About the Rise of Socialism
So It BEGINS: Fairfax County Prosecutor Throws Abigail Spanberger Under the BUS Over...
Kamala Harris to Campaign for Abdul El-Sayed in MI (Did the Rogers Campaign...
Clancy Holdout Speaks Up — > Eight 'Activist' Jurors Came in Ready to...
Scott Jennings Turns Abby Phillip Into a Sputtering Mess in Heated Debate on...
Lesbian Minister at James Talarico's Church Brags About Him Fooling People As a...
MS NOW Hosts BEG Hasan Piker to Stop Being Himself Until After the...
WOOF! Dems Are Gonna Have to Do Some SERIOUS Damage Control After Hasan...
No WONDER They Pled the FIFTH: NEW House Report Drops ActBlue's DAMNING 2024...

If the Second Amendment only applies to muskets ... tired narrative goes BOOM

Each time gun-grabbing is the Leftist movement of the moment, the same false narratives resurface. A popular epiphany among Democrats is the forefathers never envisioned modern-day arms when they wrote the Second Amendment. It is touted with a knowing air of superiority each and every time.

Advertisement

As though persons supporting the Second Amendment have no knowledge of its history or intent. Every manner of careful explanation and historical perspective has been shared with the anti-2A crowd, but they persist with condescending ‘gotcha’ points that are laughably inaccurate.

They really think they are onto something with this.

Other comparisons have been drawn, repeatedly, in an effort to demonstrate how unlikely it is that modernization changes the intent of carefully crafted Constitutional rights.

Not only can we debate the awareness of the potential development of more sophisticated weapons. There are gaping loopholes in the logic regarding the capabilities of certain arms that existed well before 1791.

Advertisement

Yes, cannons were around well before the notion of a Constitutional amendment that guaranteed citizens the right to bear arms.

There is nothing in the 2nd Amendment that expressly forbids specific weapons of choice.

https://twitter.com/VERBAL_CHANCLA/status/1536107483973816320?s=20&t=GtJ17vX7SjKTnVoeCKvx0A

Does the Left really want to give ideas to our arms-bearing friends who would be prepared to organize and defend themselves against tyranny as needed?

There are weapons that could potentially be more alarming than the modern AR-15.

While the plotting, pouncing, and mockery is fun, the angle was addressed in a 2016 US Supreme Court decision.

Everything is up for interpretation in the political arena though, so SCOTUS rulings aside, it wouldn’t hurt to cannon up folks!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement