Chelsea Clinton Promotes Killing Millions of Unborn Babies As Economic Stimulus

When it comes to snuffing out the lives of unborn babies, organizations like Planned Parenthood have no greater allies than Hillary Clinton and her daughter.

Hillary has ironically been claiming that the Trump administration and Republicans have been waging a "war on empathy":

The Trump administration’s “war on empathy,” @HillaryClinton writes, “threatens to pave the way for an extreme vision of Christian nationalism that seeks to replace democracy with theocracy in America”: https://t.co/UTI8jnNpS7 pic.twitter.com/PmumD7X37T
— The Atlantic (@TheAtlantic) January 30, 2026

Solid stuff coming from the person who led the "bimbo eruption" effort to smear women who had allegations about her husband.

But when it comes to "war on empathy" projection, Hillary's daughter definitely inherited the gene.

This is gross, not to mention idiotic:

If you can’t convince someone to support abortion with bodily rights arguments, try pushing the money angle, Chelsea Clinton told a group of abortion activists Saturday.
CNS News reports Clinton claimed the infamous U.S. Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade was a good thing, not only because it gave women the “dignity to make our own choices,” but also because it led to a $3.5 trillion boost to America’s economy.
“It is not a disconnected fact … that American women entering the labor force from 1973 to 2009 added three and a half trillion dollars to our economy. Right?” Clinton said during a “Rise Up for Roe” rally protesting U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.
“The net, new entrance of women – that is not disconnected from the fact that Roe became the law of the land in January of 1973,” she continued.

Have you ever noticed that the Left's argument for keeping millions of people in the U.S. illegally is "they add to the economy" but say snuffing out the lives of tens of millions of babies is an economic boon?

How many geniuses, scholars, spiritual leaders, fine community members were snuffed out?

Is this what void of soul looks like, Chelsea Clinton?
— Sandy 〽️ (@RightSandy) August 16, 2026

I’d rather have the babies, thanks, you total ghoul. https://t.co/Yhxjym6Bn7
— Kentucky Girl (@Kentuckygirl1) August 17, 2026

The "for the children" side are the most against the children people I've ever seen.

So they’re not only evil but greedy
— GINGERSKOL💜💛 (@GlowSurfing) August 16, 2026

And then some.

That’s 60 million, as I said in 2021, who won’t lead productive lives contributing to society and reaching their potential. Genocide of the future working class.

Socialists take your land, your assets, your companies then push murder of children whose only value to them are… https://t.co/BHJq7j57lQ
— Annie Webber (@ds_abp) August 16, 2026

This claim (and the economic framing around it) is a textbook broken-windows fallacy.

Destroying 60 million potential workers, consumers, innovators, and taxpayers does not “add” $3.5 trillion to the economy any more than smashing every window in a city “stimulates” the glass… https://t.co/qpqxm2FQ0E
— Daniel Lee (@siabaaLee) August 17, 2026

"Clinton" and "logical fallacy" go hand in hand, in this case in the most disgusting way possible.