BINGO! WSJ editorial page editor puts media's partisan hackery for Biden & Dems into disturbing perspective

Doug P. | 10:51 AM on December 14, 2020

An op-ed that ran in the Wall Street Journal recently sparked some hyperventilation among Democrats and the media. The article, written by Joseph Epstein, is about Jill Biden and titled “Is there a doctor in the White House? Not if you need an M.D.” Epstein argued that Jill Biden should drop the “doctor” honorific.

Defending the article’s publication, WSJ editorial page editor Paul Gigot managed to sum up in just a few words how much of the media works as an arm of the DNC as opposed to how they’ve covered Trump for four years:

“The difference is that when Mr. Trump rants against the press, the press mobilizes in opposition. In this case the Biden team was able to mobilize almost all of the press to join in denouncing Mr. Epstein and the ⁦@WSJ⁩.”

⁦@JERonFNC⁩ https://t.co/TKQD6UpJFq

— Alex Salvi (@alexsalvinews) December 14, 2020

Good for WSJ https://t.co/5M3nwYjnVI pic.twitter.com/EH0kE9MDUp

— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) December 13, 2020

It’s clear that “reporters” are going to dislocate some shoulders carrying some heavy water for the Bidens in the coming months and years.

“these pages aren’t going to stop publishing provocative essays merely because they offend the new administration or the political censors in the media and academe.” https://t.co/tMRNJIaaJH

— anthonybgonzalez (@Agonzo1) December 14, 2020

The fact that a media outlet gets ganged up on by other media outlets at the behest of Democrats should disturb a much larger segment of the media, but it won’t because they know pushing the Left’s narratives is job #1.