Extreme Makeover: DSA Darling AOC Begins Rebranding Campaign to Convince Voters She’s a...
Buzz Patterson Shares an Open Letter to Press Explaining Why Operations Are Classified
The Economist Outs Paw Patrol As Gender-Normative Pro-Police Propaganda
Here's a Call From the London Police About 'Malicious Communication' Set to LEGO...
Report: FBI Had 14 Informants on Biden Corruption but Ran Op to Dismiss...
Dem Gov. Hopeful Cindy Holscher in Red-State Kansas: 'No Idea If Jesus Was...
Mehdi Hasan Wonders If the Press Will Be Harder on Trump Now That...
'Playing My Own Words Is Defamation': Hasan Piker Melts Down Over Scott Jennings...
Good: Macro Rubio Did Not Answer CNN Reporter Who Asked If He Put...
Rick Wilson Is Late Getting in His Dig on Trump ‘Cowering Like a...
'Hitting the Stereotype SO on the Nose'! Pics From Francesca Hong's Farewell Event...
Ballot Pox: MS NOW’s Jen Psaki Admits Democrat Leaders Pick Nominees, Not the...
Al Jazeera Reports Ilhan Omar Won Her Primary Overwhelmingly Without Support From AIPAC
NO WAY! Journos Might Have Been Slightly Over-Dramatic About the 'Decoy' Air Force...
Florida’s Secret Sauce Revealed: Crime Crashes, Illegals Out, and America’s Safest Big Sta...

William Shatner spots irony traveling at warp speed in what some signers of Harper's 'open letter against cancel culture' did after seeing who else signed

We told you about this earlier in the week: Harper’s Magazine published a letter featuring about 150 signatories that will appear in the October print issue, and basically it expresses concern over the rise of the so-called “cancel culture.” The article includes this:

Advertisement

The free exchange of information and ideas, the lifeblood of a liberal society, is daily becoming more constricted. While we have come to expect this on the radical right, censoriousness is also spreading more widely in our culture: an intolerance of opposing views, a vogue for public shaming and ostracism, and the tendency to dissolve complex policy issues in a blinding moral certainty. We uphold the value of robust and even caustic counter-speech from all quarters. But it is now all too common to hear calls for swift and severe retribution in response to perceived transgressions of speech and thought. More troubling still, institutional leaders, in a spirit of panicked damage control, are delivering hasty and disproportionate punishments instead of considered reforms. Editors are fired for running controversial pieces; books are withdrawn for alleged inauthenticity; journalists are barred from writing on certain topics; professors are investigated for quoting works of literature in class; a researcher is fired for circulating a peer-reviewed academic study; and the heads of organizations are ousted for what are sometimes just clumsy mistakes.

After the story was made public, some signatories wanted out after seeing who else had signed.

Advertisement

Among those who spotted the irony was William Shatner:

Nailed it!

“It’s dead, Jim.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement