Gov. Gavin Newsom Signs Bills Restricting ICE’s Use of Flash Bangs, Shock Gloves,...
Scott Jennings Notes Interesting Timing of Mayor Mamdani Releasing His Anti-Antisemitism V...
A Bad Night Is Not Automatically a Crime — and Pretending It Is...
Sen. Jim Justice Walks Back (Sort of) Comments Going Soft on Immigration Enforcement
Sen. Chris Van Hollen Says Act to Ban Stock Trading Would 'Disenfranchise American...
Sean Davis Puts the Final Mushroom Cloud Over NYTimes' 'We Don't Publish Unverified...
Sen. Alex Padilla Calls Out Markwayne Mullin's 'Election Conspiracy Claims About Noncitize...
Senate Dems Block Legislation to Ban Insider Trading, Citing Attached ‘Voter Suppression’...
These Christians Risk Everything to Follow Jesus
Better Off Head? Actor John Cusack’s New High Brows Raise Low-Brow Laughs Online
End Wokeness Shows How Fast the Copy and Paste Hijacking Spin Made the...
NYTimes' Defense of Hijacking Headline Is the 'Most Unintentionally Hilarious Tweet of All...
Iran's Hail Mary Plea Just Gave Trump Everything He Needed
Socialism Is Real. It's Dangerous. And They're Organizing.
Magills Lays Out Left’s Daily Planner: Condemn Cornell 7 at Noon, Defend the...
Premium

Flashback: Were congressional Dems (and the MSM) as alarmed when Obama was launching all these strikes in Iraq and Syria without congressional approval?

President Trump approving an airstrike that killed Iran’s Quds leader has caused many Democrats to be alarmed because he did so without congressional approval or consultation:

It has to be asked: Were they as concerned during the previous administration when this was happening?

From the Washington Times in April of 2015::

U.S. forces have now surpassed 2,800 strikes against targets in Iraq and Syria under President Obama’s war against the Islamic State, all as part of a conflict Congress has yet to specifically authorize — and amid worries lawmakers won’t ever act.

Under intense pressure from Capitol Hill, Mr. Obama finally submitted a draft authorization for the use of military force against the Islamic State in February, but it’s since languished, caught in the stalemate between those who want tighter restrictions and those who want the president to have as free a hand as possible.

Now analysts worry that inaction will set a dangerous precedent and leave Congress shorn of its warmaking powers.

People can’t recall the Dems (and the media for that matter) being quite as alarmed back then as they are now:

It’s the same old same old:

A Democrat president also has the benefit of an entirely lower level of scrutiny from the media, which always helps.

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement