Rep. Adam Schiff has been among the many Democrats who have been alleging Trump/Russia “collusion” ever since Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 election:
Even the misleading memo by Republicans demonstrates that the origin of this investigation involved Papadopoulos not Page, and involved collusion with the Russians: pic.twitter.com/E2LainMNIk
— Adam Schiff (@RepAdamSchiff) February 4, 2018
Here’s where we begin our investigation into Russian interference – with circumstantial evidence of collusion & direct evidence of deception pic.twitter.com/1tobpyCjkj
— Adam Schiff (@RepAdamSchiff) March 19, 2017
Most Americans have not read Mueller’s report.
Some may be astonished to learn that a finding of “no collusion,” much less a finding of “no obstruction,” is nowhere to be seen on any page of his report.
Here’s what we do know, and what we are working to find out: pic.twitter.com/kNquinghRO
— Adam Schiff (@RepAdamSchiff) June 12, 2019
This morning, Robert Mueller testified that “no collusion” — or an examination of “collusion” in general — isn’t in the report because it’s not a thing:
In his opening statement, Mueller said the investigation did not establish that the Trump campaign conspired with Russia and the probe did not address 'collusion.' Watch live: https://t.co/JuMbL8yzlH pic.twitter.com/GTOdbx3iqe
— Reuters Top News (@Reuters) July 24, 2019
“We did not address collusion, which is not a legal term,” Mueller says.
— Josh Dawsey (@jdawsey1) July 24, 2019
So basically the congressman and many of his colleagues have been full of Schiff the whole time? We’re shocked!
Robert Mueller strikes down the foolish “no collusion” narrative in his opening statement.#MuellerHearings https://t.co/wbiv1T3wFl
— Ahmed Baba (@AhmedBaba_) July 24, 2019
EXONERATED again! https://t.co/W3cwqCAYOk
— Dan Bongino (@dbongino) July 24, 2019
Welk there goes Adam Schiff COLLUSION story.
— Darlene Sivak-Kurnig (@DARLA_1) July 24, 2019
Not that Schiff won’t keep pushing it.
Join the Conversation
VIP members get the ability to comment on articles.