Shocker! Chuck Schumer decides judge he voted for in 2006 now unworthy

Senator Chuck Schumer wasn’t won over by any of Neil Gorsuch’s testimony this week and can’t support President Trump’s SCOTUS nominee:

BREAKING: Top Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer announces he will oppose nomination of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court.

— The Associated Press (@AP) March 23, 2017

Schumer says he will vote against Gorsuch for SCOTUS & “he will have to earn 60 votes.”

Filibuster showdown is on. pic.twitter.com/Hfg9Z71nGQ

— Bradd Jaffy (@BraddJaffy) March 23, 2017

In other words:

BREAKING: Rabid left-wing partisan confirms he is a rabid left-wing partisan. https://t.co/ou90sesG7P

— Michelle Malkin (@michellemalkin) March 23, 2017

The abortion superfans at NARAL praised Schumer:

.@SenSchumer is standing for our human & civil rights. Thank you Sen. Schumer for voting NO on #Gorsuch! #WeObject https://t.co/nILyvN9KYa

— NARAL (@NARAL) March 23, 2017

Is NARAL inadvertently saying Schumer was NOT standing for progressives’ view of “human & civil rights” in 2006?

Schumer voted to confirm him in 2006. https://t.co/WDVKKKMpxl ht @redsteeze

— DC Dude (@DCDude1776) March 23, 2017

https://twitter.com/AndrewWMullins/status/826598116904333312

Recommended

Justice Kagan Writes in Dissent That the VRA ‘Was Born of the Literal Blood of Union Soldiers’

Brett T.

Advertisement

Times have changed for Schumer.

Gorsuch is the most eloquent, intellectual, ethically sound and knowledgeable nominee in a lifetime.
So of course Chuck opposes him.

— RightWired (@_donaldson) March 23, 2017

"Every day that goes by without a 9th justice is another day the American people’s business is not getting done” –Sen. Schumer #WeNeedNine https://t.co/rSPw9e8v7g

— STEW ??? ⚾️ ? (@StewSays) March 23, 2017

If the Dems filibuster the Republicans might get a chance to honor former Sen. Harry Reid by using his “nuclear option.”