WaPo op-ed's exploration of nanny state escalation is 'progressivism in two sentences'

This is an actual headline that someone wrote. https://t.co/DyEcaZhwbi

— Jason (@jasonelevation) July 20, 2016

Because maybe the government doesn’t control enough of our lives, the Washington Post is throwing this op-ed out there for consideration:

We need to eat less meat. Should the government step in?https://t.co/g87WvsxXzC

— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) July 20, 2016

Well, there it is:

Progressivism in two sentences. https://t.co/7d0PK0YJ3e

— Matthew Continetti (@continetti) July 21, 2016

That’s a nice hunk of red meat they just threw to the nanny staters for consideration, but no thanks:

https://twitter.com/GomesBolt/status/755907496775081984
https://twitter.com/JammieWF/status/755911519460790272
https://twitter.com/SonnyBunch/status/755909481255407616

Perfect example of liberal idiocy! https://t.co/lCEpjinGYe

— vball11 (@hoke_will) July 21, 2016

The second amendment was written to stop this kind of tyranny! #bacon https://t.co/ULg0Fwaghs

— D.J. Hamon (@DJ_Hamon) July 21, 2016

anyone that WANTS the government that involved in their lives needs some help.

— Toni (@ToniMZ81) July 20, 2016

https://twitter.com/JustEric/status/755919175806255104

How about you mind your own damn business? https://t.co/zMIRx84kGx

— Bob Owens (@bob_owens) July 20, 2016

Make this same article but with alcohol, see how far that gets you@washingtonpost

— ?Jack The King Ophe?? (@BlackIceSheep) July 20, 2016

https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/755924367905812480