Yep, we’ll probably be seeing lots more of these kinds of defenses from Hillary Clinton’s supporters:
https://twitter.com/MiaFarrow/status/693472650992156672
Perhaps Mia Farrow and Jennifer Granholm should join together take their vast knowledge of the content of Hillary’s emails straight to the FBI.
Q: How do you know a Clinton has been caught lying again?
A: Their sycophant followers beg you to "move on." https://t.co/uYoEsGh8Vb
— One of several Jeff Goldmans (@TheJeffGoldman) January 30, 2016
When you need the final word on national security, always check with an actress. https://t.co/S3jwrfXMVc
— Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) January 30, 2016
https://twitter.com/seanagnew/status/693475059055243264
.@MiaFarrow Marking is irrelevant to the law—just one reason operating unauthorized servers is forbidden. #letsmoveon #tothesentencingphase
— David Gaw (@davidgaw) January 30, 2016
@MiaFarrow they were classified at the time they hit the server. Just because they weren't "marked" doesn't mean it isn't classified. Stfu
— ARC11 (@TChiariJr) January 30, 2016
@MiaFarrow The law clearly states it is illegal to forward classified material, marked or unmarked. Also, how did it become unmarked?
— ???? ℂ????? (@mncahill) January 30, 2016
In the Navy, I was a classified security manager, but by all means follow the direction of Ms. Farrow @hughhewitt https://t.co/9H4VYtpMlB
— Don Palmer (@VotingGuy) January 30, 2016
https://twitter.com/Wojciehowicz/status/693481261197869061
https://twitter.com/C_Brusca/status/693478264661147648
There is no Oscar for "looking like an idiot on national security issues and the law," sorry. https://t.co/e6i7bTZYiv
— Derek Hunter (@derekahunter) January 30, 2016
And celebrity tweets about the law aren't "marked" ignorant. Follow me? @MiaFarrow
— Blame Big Government (@BlameBigGovt) January 30, 2016
https://twitter.com/Hot_take_king/status/693477515025739776
***
Related:
‘Awkward’: Here’s something that might make Hillary’s defenders cover their eyes
Join the conversation as a VIP Member