Nanny-tastic! Guess who's considering a third-party run (Hillary hardest hit?)

Hoo boy! Gird your salt shakers:

Michael Bloomberg considers third party run – https://t.co/weRZsK8Wvo pic.twitter.com/N2zODgJQc6

— The Hill Talk (@TheHillTalk) January 10, 2016

If you thought President Obama helped sell record numbers of guns, it’s staggering to imagine what a President Bloomberg would do for the industry.

Desperate times for the Socialist party who sees Hillary imploding. https://t.co/e0kPk2CCdP

— So You Think You Are Free (@CorintheansXIII) January 11, 2016

https://twitter.com/DoctorHook9/status/686577710009733122

@michellemalkin 'Abulea' vs. 'Bubbie?' This won't help the D-People.

— Passepartout (@passepartout) January 11, 2016

https://twitter.com/MRNickHagood/status/686581111191830528

That is awesome, splitting the socialists and Democrat lite communists! Shoes in an R. https://t.co/h3BTBY3RHc

— Dynadawg (@jagstachetrophy) January 11, 2016

DO IT, NANNY BLOOMBERG. https://t.co/DkwuuZUkHv

— Epstein Didn't Mush Himself (@MushKat) January 11, 2016

@michellemalkin Good, let him Michelle, taking votes from Hil(lie)ry?…

— Mark Balasco (@NEONMAN530) January 11, 2016

This is rich… pun intended https://t.co/VDaNqIiPtZ

— Lolo (@lologray79) January 11, 2016

@michellemalkin Bring it on Mike! (He's just jealous of fellow billionaire Donnie.) How about an "independent" ticket of Bloomberg-Sanders!!

— Alfred E. Newman (@AlfredENewman5) January 11, 2016