Brian Stelter Has a Pic From the Packed House at Oliver Darcy's 'Information...
Mehdi Hasan Wants Apologies From Those Who Insisted War Would Stop If Hamas...
FAIL: James Talarico Tries to Convince a Reporter He No Longer Believes All...
Joe Scarborough: White House Will Hate the Success of Tennis Star From S**thole...
Those CREEPY HANDS! Gavin Newsom Scolds JD Vance While Bragging About Healthcare for...
‘Let’s Roll’: Flight 93 Hero Todd Beamer’s Father Endorses Mike Rogers — ‘Vote...
Ted Cruz Cites CNN's Reporting on James Talarico (Kaitlan Collins Runs Cover for...
American Heroes of 9/11: Officer John W. Perry
The Party of Empathy Wishes JK Rowling Had Been Offed by Her Ex-Husband
'Morally Obtuse Idiots': Matt Walsh UNLOADS on the Lindsay Clancy Jurors the Way...
James Talarico’s Pastor: People in This Church Wish Trump’s Assassin ‘Had Been More...
Here's the Self-Refuting Media Headline of the Day That Proves 'No Such Thing...
It's Time to Talk About 'Lanterns,' the Left's Latest Effort to Destroy Something...
LA County Takes $5 Million Meant for Fire Victims and Hands It to...
South Park Spent Decades Roasting Everyone. Now It’s Just ‘Orange Man Bad’

'Make it stop!' Michelle Malkin pounds EPA for unwelcome response to river contamination

Officials from the Environmental Protection Agency are in Colorado and New Mexico to assess the fallout from one of their clean up efforts that went terribly awry.

Advertisement

The EPA’s mission is to regulate, and that “higher standard” part should keep us laughing for a while.

And get this one:

Let “science” be their guide? Just in case they might use some of the same “science” that triggered the disaster, many, including Michelle Malkin, are telling the EPA “thanks but no thanks,” just not in those words:

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos