Sunny Hostin Defended the Cornell 7 — and, Painfully, She’s Right
Rev. Suggests Lazarus Was Gay Because Jesus Called for Him to ‘Come Out’
Rep. LaMonica McIver Is Facing Prison for Touching ICE Officers — She Just...
Mamdani the Pied-À-Terrible: NYC Mayor Loses in Court on Tax-The-Rich Rollout
The Bulwark’s Focus Group Says Abdul El-Sayed Is Over-Performing With Trump Voters
Kyle Kulinski Has No Doubt Mossad Has Videos of Trump 'Doing Ungodly Things...
Cory Booker Thinks a Criminal Who Undermined One Election Is Very Likely to...
Tight Race, Tight Pants: James Talarico Victory Could Obliterate State Religion of Texas...
Venezuelan Shot by ICE Charged by DOJ With Assaulting a Federal Officer
El-Sayed Wants Money Out of Politics — Except the Soros Family That Hand-Selected...
Jack Smith Subpoenaed Checks From Thousands of Americans Who Donated As Little As...
The Cornell 7: Viral Outrage, Changing Statements, and Why Prosecutors May Have Walked...
Nikole Hannah-Jones and Her Daughter Did a Podcast. Only One of Them Truly...
CNN Doesn't Even Crack the Top 35 (Heck, Reruns on Other CHANNELS Are...
Jack Smith Under Fire As Bombshell New Trump Probe Records Surface

'Make it stop!' Michelle Malkin pounds EPA for unwelcome response to river contamination

Officials from the Environmental Protection Agency are in Colorado and New Mexico to assess the fallout from one of their clean up efforts that went terribly awry.

Advertisement

The EPA’s mission is to regulate, and that “higher standard” part should keep us laughing for a while.

And get this one:

Let “science” be their guide? Just in case they might use some of the same “science” that triggered the disaster, many, including Michelle Malkin, are telling the EPA “thanks but no thanks,” just not in those words:

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement