'Shove your righteous indignation’: Behold Cecile Richards' 'insane' attempt to turn @PPAct depravity into women-shaming issue

It's interesting how the spin for #PlannedButcherhood has been to attack ppl calling out the behavior and lie about the video being edited.

— The?FOO (@PolitiBunny) July 15, 2015

That’s what @PPAct and its allies have been attempting to do, and Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood, is demonstrating how it’s done:

Spreading false information is an age-old strategy of people hell-bent on denying women care & shaming them for exercising their rights.

— Cecile Richards (@CecileRichards) July 15, 2015

Shaming women? False information? No, no, no:

@DLoesch @CecileRichards Who's shaming the women? We're shaming YOU.

— ?rockmom ? (@rockmom) July 15, 2015

Bingo! And if Richards is concerned about what “information” is put out there, she might want to have a chat with the woman in the video:

Your head doc "spread false info" on camera in her own words, @CecileRichards ? Weird. https://t.co/RM0YoYZjLL

— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) July 15, 2015

@DLoesch Maybe @CecileRichards meant the special effects wizards at ILM cooked up a CG version of one of her own boasting about baby parts.

— MacroAggressions ❌ (@DenierNyc) July 15, 2015

Richards doesn’t seem eager to specifically point out what was “out of context” or “false” about the claims made in the video.

https://twitter.com/McCarthyKnew/status/621427284772306944

@CecileRichards False information: not specified.

— David Steinberg (@realDSteinberg) July 15, 2015

Recommended

Nancy Mace Goes 'There' Ending Adam Kinzinger for Trying to Pick a Fight Over Men in Women's Bathrooms

Sam J.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/MarkMMcClain/status/621416460120932352
https://twitter.com/jmart29418/status/621423721107070976

Sorry @CecileRichards I'm having trouble hearing you with that fetus liver in your mouth.@DLoesch

— theRoddick (@_jbarker) July 15, 2015

https://twitter.com/Live_Free_orDie/status/621424204546744323

@CecileRichards I provided link to video of your employee. Which "information" did she assert which is "false"?http://t.co/5Taw3NgydN

— Slechte Verslaggever (@DizzyMedia) July 15, 2015

@CecileRichards If it isn't shameful, then why use euphemisms?

— Aaron Shafovaloff (@aaronshaf) July 15, 2015

https://twitter.com/lybr3/status/621421037897449472
https://twitter.com/JayCaruso/status/621420422614155264

@CecileRichards you support selling baby parts for sport. what did i miss? #prolife

— Ryan (@chasinghumility) July 15, 2015

You have NO RIGHTS to crush from above, crush from below while the baby is still alive in womb. https://t.co/eHSKc2QBz4

— Sandy 〽️ (@RightGlockMom) July 15, 2015

@CecileRichards @bayareahausfrau another age-old strategy is referring to abortion as 'care' for women

— BDJinCO (@DissidentBiker) July 15, 2015

@CecileRichards @bayareahausfrau What part of the information is false? Why haven't you broken it down and disputed it?

— Mr Chrome (@BradMarshv1) July 15, 2015

MT @CecileRichards Spreading false information is an age-old strategy of people hell-bent on illegally selling human organs for profit.

— Aldous Huxley's Ghost™ (@AF632) July 15, 2015

Selling baby body parts is an age-old strategy of an organization hell-bent on exploiting vulnerable women. https://t.co/Q4abcfhWj0

— Bill Kristol (@BillKristol) July 15, 2015

So we’re left with two possibilities:

https://twitter.com/katembryan/status/621419218131636225

Everybody knows what the most likely answer is.

It must be a lot easier to keep talking to avoid the question rather than answer it:

@CecileRichards yes or no: does your organization sell off specific organs of the fetuses it aborts?

— Razor (@hale_razor) July 15, 2015

Go ahead and answer, Ms. Richards. We’ll wait…