A new Peter Schweizer book titled “Clinton Cash” details how, when Hillary Clinton the secretary of state, Clinton Foundation donors received favorable treatment. Schweizer apparently didn’t give any Democrats a heads-up, which for comes as a surprise to some:
Author of controversial new Clinton book admits that he did not brief Democrats on content http://t.co/w1WmMzggx0 pic.twitter.com/z2OG7tU8ku
— HuffPost Politics (@HuffPostPol) April 26, 2015
The nerve!
Why would he do that RT @HuffPostPol: Author of controversial new Clinton book admits that he did not brief Democrats on content
— The Dying Pundit (@deep_beige) April 26, 2015
David Limbaugh put it this way:
Why would he subject himself to people whose interest in the truth is infinitely superseded by their partisanship? https://t.co/YovC7TH5VB
— David Limbaugh (@DavidLimbaugh) April 27, 2015
Great question!
@DavidLimbaugh @deep_beige @HuffPostPol that used to be called "journalism"
— Labor Conservative (@Ggoblue) April 27, 2015
https://twitter.com/ReeseDelaney/status/592511454617571329
Recommended
@DavidLimbaugh A) Why would he need to brief Dems? and B) I doubt they would have even WANTED to be "briefed" on his book.
— Jason Willoughby ?? (@jpwilloughby) April 27, 2015
https://twitter.com/crisp_aw/status/592489740588351488
In a recent interview, Schweizer said his book does not contain “direct evidence” of Clinton wrongdoing, but Charles Krauthammer has explained why very little may exist.
***
Related:
Hello, Hillary! Care to comment on why a watchdog called the Clinton Foundation a ‘slush fund’?
Join the conversation as a VIP Member