Seriously? MSNBC's Statue of Liberty poem hot takes get HISTORICALLY ridiculous

The Acosta vs. Miller dustup at yesterday’s press conference has the pro-Resistance crowd pulling out all the stops, no matter how ridiculous:

Historians slam the WH remarks about the Statue of Liberty:"It's like saying the Bill of Rights doesn't count': https://t.co/lQKHUwWzm9 pic.twitter.com/c9ZAqxQTrq

— MSNBC (@MSNBC) August 3, 2017

They do try SO hard.

https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/893173825600401409

Unreal.

https://twitter.com/BradyDube/status/893182756800344064

In other words, totally comparable according to some.

https://twitter.com/SouthernKeeks/status/893174006836318210
https://twitter.com/CrankyGordon/status/893177448787038211

Congress ratified the Bill of Rights, guys. Not that it makes the statement okay, just…come on. https://t.co/4Ui4nCh3QE

— Emily Zanotti’s Great & Unmatched Wisdom (@emzanotti) August 3, 2017

It is literally not even remotely analogous to that. https://t.co/rUdXYvPL5L

— The Snark Knight (@TheBrownFolder) August 3, 2017

https://twitter.com/28ShermanSOBL1/status/893176193419169792

No part of the statue of liberty is in the bill of rights, which is actual law. But, you would know that if you were actual historians https://t.co/Oi3dOyRCIU

— Tommy (@TommyBeeswax) August 3, 2017

What's the plural of ignoramus?

That's what makes up the staff at @MSNBC https://t.co/sVuss0w7Vm

— BayAreaFrau (@bayareahausfrau) August 3, 2017

I am unaware of the amendment that incorporated The New Colossus. Historians. https://t.co/KBV1JrB3vM

— Jorge Bonilla (@BonillaJL) August 3, 2017

Anyone that would compare a Constitutional amendment to a poem is a flack, not a historian. https://t.co/Qz5jUzEYMk

— Persnickety (@Dawnsfire) August 3, 2017