Mike Lee DISMANTLES Dems' MUH CONSTITUTION Anti-SAVE Act Talking Point With Their Own...
A Dem So Bad Even Mark Kelly Doesn't Like Her? WOOF: DESPERATE MI...
New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani Leads Public Prayer in Prospect Park
British MPs Call for Investigation of Member Who Called Mass Public Muslim Prayers...
Cato Director Says It’s ‘Totally False’ That Noncitizens Get Welfare at Double the...
Minnesota City Bringing Back the Old, ‘Problematic’ State Flag
Jim Acosta Whines to Adam Schiff at Pretend Hearing About Trump and MAGA...
WSJ: Boom in Autism Therapy Is ‘Medicaid’s Fastest-Growing Jackpot’
AOC Needs More Than Therapy: $19K in Donor Money for Ketamine Shrink
MAGA Allegedly Mad at The Pitt for Portraying Very Realistic Scene of ICE...
The Bulwark’s Tim Miller Asks James Talarico About the Size of ‘God’s Sausage’
Match Day 2026: Celebrating the Joy, Questioning the System – Time to Prioritize...
Polymarket's Meme Bar Fails Spectacularly – TVs Down, Vibes Crashed, Situation Unmonitored
Hasan Piker Declares: 'Good Cubans' Stay Starving Under Communism—'Crazy' Ones Left for Fr...
Trump Admin Moving Forward With Deporting 'Maryland Man' (Sen. Van Hollen Has Time...

Prosecutors seek to drop Capitol riot case that was based on 'evidence' from a paid confidential informant

NBC News is reporting that federal prosecutors on Tuesday told a judge they intend to drop a case against Christopher Kelly, who was arrested January 20 in connection with the January 6 storming of the Capitol by Trump supporters. There are nearly 500 such cases pending, so the prosecution is off to a bad start.

Advertisement

Pete Williams reports:

The man, Christopher Kelly of New York City, was arrested Jan. 20 after the FBI said a paid confidential informant told agents that Kelly was posting material on a Facebook Messenger app about the riot and his plans to be in Washington on Jan. 6. The informant said a photo taken inside the Capitol was also posted, according to the FBI.

In the charging documents filed in court, an FBI agent said, “I believe the messages and image … reflect that Chris Kelly was using this account to inform associates that he had breached the Capitol and was inside.”

The court document accompanying the charges included photos that the FBI said showed Kelly on the Capitol grounds, but they did not include any further indication that he entered the building.

Other riot cases have included data from cellphone service providers indicating that defendants’ phones were inside the building. This case did not. Nor did it include any photos of Kelly himself inside the Capitol or offer any direct proof that he was among the rioters.

Can they get their deposit back from the informant?

Advertisement

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement