Scott Jennings Calls Birthright Citizenship Ruling by SCOTUS an ‘Abomination’ That Benefit...
Dems Frame Their SCOTUS Birthright Citizenship Victory As a Hyper-Partisan Loss, Vow to...
NYC DSA Leader Won’t Condemn Darializa Avila Chevalier’s Post About Wiping Her Dirty...
Third Reich Rugrat: Middle School Yearbook Baby Photo Is Causing a ‘Führer’ in...
Ringleader of Pakistani Grooming Gang Stripped of Citizenship but Can't Be Deported
PA Senators Reach Across the Aisle to Rally Commonwealth for Great American State...
The Amish Clearly Do Not Want to Assimilate Into American Society, Yet the...
The Nation Scolds AOC for Never Apologizing for Covering for the Pro-Genocide Wing...
Axios: GOP Reboots the Red Scare as Young Voters Embrace Socialism
Elon Musk Responds to Nicholas Kristof’s List of Children He’s Killed With Aid...
Gov. Tim Walz: The Supreme Court Says States Can Be Cruel to Trans...
NBC Offers Viewers a 'Trigger Warning' Before Reporting the SCOTUS Ruling on Title...
Anchor Baby Congresswoman Celebrates Birthright Citizenship Ruling by 'Sell-Out Supreme Co...
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Uses … (Wait for It) … TikTok Slang in...
Ro Khanna Is One Wealthy MOFO and Here I Thought Democrats Were the...

Prosecutors seek to drop Capitol riot case that was based on 'evidence' from a paid confidential informant

NBC News is reporting that federal prosecutors on Tuesday told a judge they intend to drop a case against Christopher Kelly, who was arrested January 20 in connection with the January 6 storming of the Capitol by Trump supporters. There are nearly 500 such cases pending, so the prosecution is off to a bad start.

Advertisement

Pete Williams reports:

The man, Christopher Kelly of New York City, was arrested Jan. 20 after the FBI said a paid confidential informant told agents that Kelly was posting material on a Facebook Messenger app about the riot and his plans to be in Washington on Jan. 6. The informant said a photo taken inside the Capitol was also posted, according to the FBI.

In the charging documents filed in court, an FBI agent said, “I believe the messages and image … reflect that Chris Kelly was using this account to inform associates that he had breached the Capitol and was inside.”

The court document accompanying the charges included photos that the FBI said showed Kelly on the Capitol grounds, but they did not include any further indication that he entered the building.

Other riot cases have included data from cellphone service providers indicating that defendants’ phones were inside the building. This case did not. Nor did it include any photos of Kelly himself inside the Capitol or offer any direct proof that he was among the rioters.

Can they get their deposit back from the informant?

Advertisement

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement