MI’s Jewish AG Supports Abdul El-Sayed Because He’ll Better Protect Separation of Church...
Socialist Asks What You Want Your Tax Dollars Going to If Not Food...
Lunatic Tries to Run Down Maine Wire Reporter for 'Invasion of Privacy': Suspect...
Woman Mystified by Middle Eastern-Looking Men Filling Up Walmart Grocery Carts With Milk...
Shooting Outside High School Football Game in Minnesota Blamed on Somali Gangs
Amy Siskind Wants All 57 Men in Cornell Fraternity’s Group Chat Investigated and...
Extreme or Extremely Funny? Steve Hilton ‘Lesbian’ Campaign Ad Is Rubbing Some Voters...
Ro Khanna Can't Believe Vance Would Go So Low As to Tell a...
Bill Maher Roasts Hack Media Over Reports of an Argument in the Cockpit...
TMZ: Christa Pike Donated Her Last Meal Money to Buy Pizza for the...
Steve Hilton Couldn't Help but Notice What Susan Rice's Demand About Xavier Becerra...
This Explosive Headline Is a Lock for First-Ballot Induction Into the 'TDS Hall...
The Evolution of the Dems' 'Noncitizen Voting Never Happens' to This Judge's Ruling...
Hot Take on The View: Biden Might Still Be President If Dems/Media Had...
School Is in Session! Tom Homan Teaches 'Deportation 101' to Reporter Pushing Dem...

How about no? Sen. Kamala Harris wants a freeze on judicial nominees during impeachment trial

Speaker Nancy Pelosi is currently headlining the media circus that is the signing of the two articles of impeachment against President Trump, going on about how it’s “so sad, so tragic for our country” as if members of Congress like Rep. Rashida Tlaib hadn’t exclaimed, “We’re gonna impeach the motherf**ker!” months and months ago, long before the roulette ball landed on Ukraine.

Advertisement

Sen. Kamala Harris has an idea to take advantage of the impeachment trial, and that’s to propose a freeze on judicial nominees.

The Hill reports:

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) on Wednesday called for a moratorium on judicial nominees during President Trump’s impeachment trial in the Senate, citing a similar pause during former President Clinton’s trial in 1999.

“The president is charged with high crimes and misdemeanors, and the Senate must take seriously its constitutional role in this process,” Harris said in a statement. “During the time when articles of impeachment are before the Senate, it would be wholly inappropriate to advance the president’s nominees to the federal judiciary.”

Advertisement

Advertisement

Remember when the narrative was that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was supposed to recuse himself because he couldn’t be trusted to be an impartial juror? Does this sound like an impartial juror?

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement