We knew from her tweets that the New York Times’ Sarah Jeong had it in for “dumbass f**king white people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants,” but she also seems to have a problem with conservatives who think the media is liberally biased.
Jeong writes about technology, and today she’s tweeting about the removal of human judgment from the selection of Facebook’s trending topics, allowing the platform to turn into an informational dystopia:
The original story had a conservative source complaining about humans using editorial judgment to pick "liberal media" over, say, Breitbart. Liberal media being defined as, uh, almost every major news outlet
— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) November 14, 2018
The result was the removal of human judgment calls from what kind of news people saw on Facebook, and the informational dystopia we live today
— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) November 14, 2018
The never-ending conservative tantrum over "bias" on platforms is a paranoid fantasy birthed by right-pandering clickbait that has justified the withholding of factual findings on Russian misinformation campaigns
— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) November 14, 2018
This is exactly the sort of thing that should be on the NYT op-ed pages and I can't believe they cut her loose https://t.co/gn2NArfXVk
— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) November 14, 2018
Narrator: The New York Times did not cut her loose. She did take a break from Twitter, though.
Nice to have you back.
— ? damned sinker ? (@dansinker) November 14, 2018
I can’t believe that she has a job
— Rusty Rootbeer (@RustyRootbeer) November 14, 2018
She’s got it down good.
— Phillip Ruland (@Rulo123) November 14, 2018
Hot take of the day https://t.co/kw0oSB25ko
— Iangreenest (@Iangreenest) November 14, 2018
I agree, there is no bias against conservatives in silicon valley or the media 100% my take on the situation. https://t.co/l6XhNTZLfW
— Comfortably Smug (@ComfortablySmug) November 14, 2018
— BeanFromPa ??? (@BeanfromPa) November 14, 2018
No, actually, it is not. But you go ahead and keep believing that if it makes you happy.
— Jim Seymour (@twtr_jim) November 14, 2018
Well that settles it. https://t.co/pAXBPrlWES
— Blue Shift Blog (@BlueShiftBlog) November 14, 2018
Yeah, OK. https://t.co/8ygK2tRIod
— Lifelong Democrat Strategist (@JammieWF) November 14, 2018
Yeah, the NYT isn’t biased.
?
— Iangreenest (@Iangreenest) November 14, 2018
"Bias" pic.twitter.com/j7ErC7MnNj
— Zed (@lotekzed) November 14, 2018
YEAH!! Wait..who what now?
— Just_Mike_S (@Just_Mike_S) November 14, 2018
This chick smashes words together like a child with toys. And she thinks she said something meaningful. https://t.co/RIdYMFYRvp
— [red] (@red06762281) November 14, 2018
The New York Times hired this person. https://t.co/ME3fwJbAwx
— Abner Snopes ن (@humidpress) November 14, 2018
Related:
"Dumba*s f*cking white people!" NYT's newest editorial board member, Sarah Jeong, wanted to "cancel" white people https://t.co/JiBpddPciW
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) August 2, 2018
Join the Conversation
VIP members get the ability to comment on articles.