So, is the big blue wave going to materialize, or is there going to be a red tsunami to counter it? We checked in with New York Times op-ed columnist David Brooks, and he seems to think this might turn out to be a “two-wave” election.
This is looking like a two wave election. We knew the Dem wave was going to be big. Republican wave surprisingly robust.
— David Brooks (@nytdavidbrooks) November 7, 2018
So there are two big waves going opposite directions? And that means …
— Isthisthingon? (@NorthHarborNYC) November 7, 2018
What the heck does this mean?
— CJT (@FalconHunter482) November 7, 2018
It’s early… pic.twitter.com/EYxgynYc6I
— April Snow (@april_s22) November 7, 2018
? eh?
— Steve Johnson (@stevojohns) November 7, 2018
Two waves crashing against each other… don't get caught in between them.
— Voice of The Mute (@eduardoauthor) November 7, 2018
When two waves of equal length and opposite amplitude collide, the resulting waveform has an amplitude of zero#DestructiveInterference
cc @neiltyson https://t.co/yV5G3UZoUx— Eric Wilhelm (@ehwilhelm) November 7, 2018
I guess chaos, mayhem, stupidity is the new normal…wonderful…two more years of BS and nonsense…
— PoliticallyCorrect (@brokennews101) November 7, 2018
Whatever Brooks was trying to say, Democrats seemed to dislike hearing it … this was supposed to be a BLUE WAVE. Period.
Related:
'Your smug is showing': Elitist twerp Paul Krugman can't resist this Election Day dig at flyover country https://t.co/9OIwynUQQQ
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) November 6, 2018
Join the conversation as a VIP Member