Cameron Kasky ‘Retracts’ His ‘Accidental’ Twice-Told Trump Global Sex-Trafficking Ring Lie...
Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger’s Hardcore Leftist Reveal Proves There Are No Moderate De...
Minnesota Trans Rep. Leigh Finke Demands Escalation: Keep Storming Churches to Force ICE...
Professional Agitator William Kelly Again Dares AG Pam Bondi to Charge Him
Touch Grass, Dude ... Bill Madden Thinks Usha Vance's Baby Is a Distraction...
Dem Strategist Tells CNN GOP Are the Same People Who Opened Fire Hydrants...
Steeped in Scripture, Sick of Sellouts: A Christian Response to Pastors Who Equate...
ICE Agent Refuses to Show Warrant to Lib Because 'You're a Nobody'
New NJ Gov. Mikie Sherrill Compares ICE to British Standing Armies in Colonial...
Set-Up? Unhinged NPR Intern Punches, Pepper-Sprays Independent Journalist on Philly Bus
Terrifying: Licensed Ohio Nurse in Charge of Home Care Wishes Severe Harm on...
Keith Ellison Proves to Don Lemon He Doesn’t Know What the FACE Act...
The View’s Slavery Claim Got My Attention — So I Dug Into the...
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Cites the Black Codes as Constitutional in Gun Control...
Celebrating One Year of Trump's Second Term: VIP Flash Sale!

Christine Blasey Ford's lawyers trying to dictate which news outlets are allowed to cover her

The Washington Times is reporting Tuesday that Christine Blasey Ford’s lawyers are attempting to dictate exactly how her testimony will be covered, right down to the number of cameras and which press agencies will be allowed to take pictures.

Advertisement

Stephen Dinan and Rowan Scarborough report:

Michael Bromwich said in emails sent Tuesday afternoon that he was requesting access for three “robocams,” three specific wire services, photographers from the Associated Press, Reuters and one unspecified service, and a pool reporter for newspapers and magazines. In a follow-up email he specified that the robocams should be operated by “the CSPAN TV pool,” and said he also wanted space for a radio reporter.

While committees sometimes limit press based on space at hearings, and some witnesses have arranged to have their identities shielded, longtime Capitol Hill watchers struggled to think of precedent for a witness dictating terms of press coverage.

Are we the only ones who think it’s ridiculous that one accuser with precious little evidence is dictating a seemingly endless list of conditions that must be met for her to appear?

Advertisement

Advertisement

Good one.


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos