Megyn Kelly's Bright Idea of 'Saving' Erika Kirk Sounds Like Bending the Knee...
Harmeet Dhillon Has a Question for Kimmel and 'No One Is Above the...
Abigail Spanberger Shows Virginia Who She REALLY Is When Journo Asks Her About...
Our Friend, Charlie Kirk
American Heroes of 9/11: Chief Peter Ganci, Jr.
MS NOW Finds All SORTS of Republicans Suddenly Voting for James Talarico, There's...
HOOOBOY: John Thune Receives BRUTAL Wake-Up Call from His Own Party at RNC...
YIKES: What the Lone Holdout Juror Had to Endure During Clancy Deliberations Keeps...
Jim Acosta Asks Why It's OK for Ted Cruz to Go on The...
Obama Attempts Rewriting History Where He's the GOOD GUY and Conservative X Ain't...
Ted Lieu Thought It Was Smart to Play DUMB About Jimmy Kimmel's Talarico...
Genius Troll? Trump Promises Americans $5,000 If Republicans Win House and Senate
Lefties Are Gonna BLOOOW! Brandon Gill’s RNC ‘Land Acknowledgment’ Was an EPIC, Patriot...
James Talarico Busted Big Time for Lying About Opposing Biological Males Playing in...
Bernie Sanders Has a Billion Reasons Why He’s Sparing Gov. JB Pritzker From...

Christine Blasey Ford's lawyers trying to dictate which news outlets are allowed to cover her

The Washington Times is reporting Tuesday that Christine Blasey Ford’s lawyers are attempting to dictate exactly how her testimony will be covered, right down to the number of cameras and which press agencies will be allowed to take pictures.

Advertisement

Stephen Dinan and Rowan Scarborough report:

Michael Bromwich said in emails sent Tuesday afternoon that he was requesting access for three “robocams,” three specific wire services, photographers from the Associated Press, Reuters and one unspecified service, and a pool reporter for newspapers and magazines. In a follow-up email he specified that the robocams should be operated by “the CSPAN TV pool,” and said he also wanted space for a radio reporter.

While committees sometimes limit press based on space at hearings, and some witnesses have arranged to have their identities shielded, longtime Capitol Hill watchers struggled to think of precedent for a witness dictating terms of press coverage.

Are we the only ones who think it’s ridiculous that one accuser with precious little evidence is dictating a seemingly endless list of conditions that must be met for her to appear?

Advertisement

Advertisement

Good one.


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement