Chuck Schumer Found a Way to Inject Anti-Trump Politics Into the Artemis II...
Laura Ingraham Says One Question Alone Indicates How Preposterous Justice KBJ’s Appointmen...
TDS Media Claim Trump Was Made to Feel 'Very Small' With a Bad...
Jasmine Crockett Says Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson ‘Continues to Flex Her Brilliance’
‘If I Steal a Wallet in Japan,’ Justice KBJ Argues That Makes Her...
Ron DeSantis Is Not a Boomer: FL Gov Drops Common Sense on Worthless...
Harmeet Dhillon and Others Weigh in As Dems Hyperventilate About Trump's SCOTUS Visit
Trump Stares Down Liberal Justices As Ketanji Brown Jackson Cracks Under Pressure
The Christian School Movement of the 1970s
Whitney Cummings Admits She's Diagnosed Crazy, Then Proves It by Claiming Trump Runs...
'So Effing Effed': Nevada Dem Rep. Susie Lee Drops Vulgar Meltdown Over Trump...
WaPo Joins Lib Media Hacks Circling the Wagons in Attempt to Make Eric...
Congrats, Justice Jackson! Even Sotomayor and Kagan Think You’re the Dumbest One Now
Judicial Activism Run Amok: Obama Judge Orders Trump to Make Illegals Legal Again...
Dems Say Trump's Shattering Political Norms and Trying to Intimidate SCOTUS Justices

Christine Blasey Ford's lawyers trying to dictate which news outlets are allowed to cover her

The Washington Times is reporting Tuesday that Christine Blasey Ford’s lawyers are attempting to dictate exactly how her testimony will be covered, right down to the number of cameras and which press agencies will be allowed to take pictures.

Advertisement

Stephen Dinan and Rowan Scarborough report:

Michael Bromwich said in emails sent Tuesday afternoon that he was requesting access for three “robocams,” three specific wire services, photographers from the Associated Press, Reuters and one unspecified service, and a pool reporter for newspapers and magazines. In a follow-up email he specified that the robocams should be operated by “the CSPAN TV pool,” and said he also wanted space for a radio reporter.

While committees sometimes limit press based on space at hearings, and some witnesses have arranged to have their identities shielded, longtime Capitol Hill watchers struggled to think of precedent for a witness dictating terms of press coverage.

Are we the only ones who think it’s ridiculous that one accuser with precious little evidence is dictating a seemingly endless list of conditions that must be met for her to appear?

Advertisement

Advertisement

Good one.


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement