Scott Jennings Breaks Out Puppets and Crayons to End Jake Tapper in Debate...
The GOAT! ---> Tom Homan's Response to Dems Getting All Big and Bad...
HAHAHA! Democrats Conduct Early 2028 Presidential Poll and Guess Who Tops the List...
'Ignorant Numbskull': James Woods DROPS Joe Biden for Bragging About 'Climate Change' Spen...
Sorry, Dude, Women Only: Nancy Mace Drafts Resolution to Ban Men From House...
Star Wars Episode X: The Escape of the Bluesky Jedi
We Were First to Call the Election
Post-Election Meltdowns Set to Heavy Metal and It Works
Ex-Agent Tells The Hill Kash Patel Would Do ‘Massive Damage’ to the FBI
MSNBC Host Says ‘Normalizing Trump Is a Bad Idea’
Riley Gaines Wonders When Dems Will Kneel for 18 Minutes to Honor Laken...
Jen Psaki Schooled on President Biden's Cabinet Picks and Their Experience
JoJoFromJerz Triggered by Joe Scarborough’s Meeting With Literally Hitler
Back to the Future? Why Some Trump Voters Are Feeling Like It's the...
End Wokeness' 'Two Genders' Post on Bluesky Doesn't Last 30 Seconds

Christine Blasey Ford's lawyers trying to dictate which news outlets are allowed to cover her

The Washington Times is reporting Tuesday that Christine Blasey Ford’s lawyers are attempting to dictate exactly how her testimony will be covered, right down to the number of cameras and which press agencies will be allowed to take pictures.

Advertisement

Stephen Dinan and Rowan Scarborough report:

Michael Bromwich said in emails sent Tuesday afternoon that he was requesting access for three “robocams,” three specific wire services, photographers from the Associated Press, Reuters and one unspecified service, and a pool reporter for newspapers and magazines. In a follow-up email he specified that the robocams should be operated by “the CSPAN TV pool,” and said he also wanted space for a radio reporter.

While committees sometimes limit press based on space at hearings, and some witnesses have arranged to have their identities shielded, longtime Capitol Hill watchers struggled to think of precedent for a witness dictating terms of press coverage.

Are we the only ones who think it’s ridiculous that one accuser with precious little evidence is dictating a seemingly endless list of conditions that must be met for her to appear?

Advertisement

Advertisement

Good one.


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos